Thank you for standing by and welcome to Enablance's fourth quarter and full year fiscal 2026 earnings conference call. This time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, and if you have joined via the webinar, please use the raised hand icon, which can be found on the bottom of your webinar application. I would now like to turn the call over to Nicole Kunzman with the Blue Shirt Group. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon and thank you for joining us to discuss Enablance's fourth quarter fiscal 2026 results. With me on the call are Enablance's CEO Todd Haugen and CFO Steve Cohn. The press release announcing our financial results for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2026 was issued earlier today and is posted to our investor relations website. Before we begin, I'll remind everyone that certain statements we make on today's call are forward looking, including statements related to our guidance for fiscal year 2027, Thank you so much for joining us. Finally, unless otherwise noted, we will be discussing results based on IFRS accounting standards on today's call. Now, let me turn the call over to Todd for an overview of the quarter and updates on Enablance's business. Todd?

Thank you, Nicole. And thanks to everyone for joining us today. I'm very excited to be here this afternoon on our first ever earnings call. The goal of our call today is to provide you with details around our fourth quarter results, offer perspective on our fiscal 27 guidance, and give you some insights into the underlying drivers of the growth inflection Enablance is seeing today. We have a really unique opportunity in front of us, and we want to make sure that our excitement and vision for the future resonates with the investment community. Let's start with our fourth quarter results. We generated $2.9 million U.S. revenue in Q4. That represents a growth of 38% year-over-year. Gross margin was 8%, an improvement of 36% year-over-year, and our second consecutive quarter of positive gross margin. We finished the fiscal year at a run rate of 375 wafer starts per week, hitting the target we outlined in March of this year. I'm very pleased with the growth and progress that our team delivered this year, and we are just getting started. Many of you are likely new to Enablance, and so I'd like to take time on this call to explain how we got here and why we are confidently optimistic about the future. Starting with a 30,000-foot view, Enablance is a vertically integrated U.S.-based provider of PLC optical chips and assemblies that are increasingly critical to AI infrastructure in North America and around the world. We focus on three lines of business, optical communications, sensing, and computing. The company was founded in 2004, started trading in July of 2006, and our first production facility opened in Fremont, California in 2008 through the purchase of a key supplier and devices. We've invested more than two decades in R&D and our optical component technology, and we've built a customer base and partner network that includes dozens of blue chip enterprises, including many of the largest names leading today's AI revolution. While our goal has always been to deliver highly performant differentiated optical chips to our customers, in the last five years, we've been able to refine our technology, demonstrating our technical superiority in the market. Our customers recognize our differentiation, and it's been a key driver of demand acceleration recently. Today, we find ourselves squarely in a sweet spot as a supplier of a critical building block of AI infrastructure. Enablance produces the PLC optical chips, our multi-trillion dollar AI data center built-outs. And while we have the technology and products to address the explosive demand the market is experiencing for these optical chips, Enablance is currently capacity constrained. Customer demand for our chips meaningfully exceeds our current production capacity and our manufacturing output is completely sold out through the end of fiscal 27. The core component of our growth story is launching a second production facility in Q3 of fiscal 27 to meet the explosive market demand. But before I get into all the details around our capacity expansion roadmap, let me first double click on the macro backdrop that's positioned us for success today. The AI revolution is clearly the biggest tailwind here. The infrastructure build out to support today's AI super cycle is estimated to total 7 trillion in investments. This figure comes from a McKinsey report that was delivered more than two years ago. The spend on data centers is going to continue through 2030 at a minimum. At nearly 1% of global GDP, the $7 trillion figure was intended to represent the ceiling of possible investment. However, by January 2026, market reality suggests that the $7 trillion figure is a conservative floor on the global AI infrastructure, and the reality is this figure could be significantly higher. Our PLC optical chips are critical in networking, sensing, and compute infrastructure, which is the foundation that enables the AI revolution. We've played a role in providing communication chips for data centers and networking, but now with copper reaches its limitations, optics is key in enabling customers to handle the computing requirements of modern AI data centers. And this has opened up huge opportunities for us to expand beyond communications into compute, which is, you know, Optics inside the chassis and sensing for robotics and self-driving cars and the like. Looking at the data center networking piece alone, there's been a structural shift away from copper to optical chips. Copper is inefficient at 200 G per lane and limited to runs of only a meter in length at 400 G per lane. Hyperscale data centers are increasingly relying on compact power efficient optical solutions to overcome silicon and thermal limitations. while OEMs push for lower energy per bit performance and higher port density. This dynamic is making hybrid photonic integration, especially PLC architectures, a critical enabler for the next generation of data and AI. This is exactly what's driving surging demand for optical chips in the data center. And it's reflected in the dollar being invested in data center interconnect, which is now the number two spending category in data center build-outs. And it represents 15% of the total CapEx up from 6% historically. There's clearly a critical need for PLC chips across data centers globally. Enableness has proven itself as an established supplier with tier one customers having sold and deployed over 20 million chips to date. Our relationships across the industry include blue chip enterprises spanning AI communication, sensing, and compute, and many of the multinational organizations you would recognize as enterprises leading the AI revolution. Our technology is trusted in some of the most critical AI infrastructure build-outs around the world. Looking beyond data center interconnect, our PLC optical chips have applications across robotics, telecommunications infrastructure, LIDAR for autonomous vehicles, aerospace defense, non-invasive medical engineering, and a range of other applications. While AI communications infrastructure drives the majority of revenue today, we see significant growth in these adjacent areas as well. For example, our PLC chips for FMCW LiDAR sensors support the growing demand for a wide range of advanced industrial applications where high precision is critical to ensuring advanced automation. For example, automotives, robots, and industrial automation all require the most precise navigation and obstacle detection capabilities. In robotics, enhanced operational reliability and dynamic environments is critical. Most importantly, in automotive, PLC-based FMCW Lighter provides real-time, accurate velocity awareness that can be a matter of saving lives. In addition to our continued growth in these adjacent areas, I'm excited to talk about our success moving up the value chain from PLC wafers into component assemblies and optical engines. This positions us really well for the longer-term opportunity we see in front of us and our plan to expand beyond assemblies and optical engines into modules and OCS systems in fiscal 27 and 28. This gives us an opportunity to unlock multifold revenue expansion on a per unit basis while meeting direct customer demand, particularly in Europe and North America. This movement up the value chain expands our addressable market by 7x and so is a huge opportunity for us. While the AI revolution is proving to be a tailwind for many across the ecosystem, Enable is also benefiting from our geopolitically advantageous supply chain structure. In August, we announced the completion of our advanced optical manufacturing facility in Vietnam, which we developed in partnership with Shuyuan Technologies, better known as SYT. Our supply chain now integrates chip design in Ottawa, wafer fabrication, Specialized Assembly Packaging and Test in our FAB in Fremont, California, and Advanced High Volume Packaging and Assembly in SYT's facility in Vietnam. The launch of our facility in Vietnam now makes Enablance the only non-captive PLC FAB in North America offering a completely ex-China supply chain. and this is already driving significant interest in North America. Our specific model is ideal for, particularly for North American cloud hyperscalers and tier one optical module makers. We're looking to mitigate exposure to geopolitical risks, which is an ongoing threat in today's global environment. We're proud of what we've achieved and the momentum we've had customers, particularly given our relative scale, Our traction in the market is clearly indicative of the differentiated technology we're offering our customers. The success of today's high-performance AI data centers is becoming dependent on how quickly and efficiently data can move, not solely on compute capacity alone. Chips are powering the critical bridge between scale-up compute density, scale-out cluster performance, and the scale across optical networks, creating better outcomes for our customers. Returning now to the discussion around capacity and our expansion opportunity, fiscal 22 was the beginning of a turning point for Enablums. The year I joined, we pivoted our focus to future chip cycles, including 800G, 1.16, LiDAR, and compute products, and formally established a production goal of 100 wafers per week by the end of that year. By fiscal 24, we began acquiring key customers and had secured demand for over 500 wafers per week, exceeding our 125 wafer per week capacity. Fiscal 24 was the beginning of our inflection point. We invested in new equipment and infrastructure that would eventually allow us to exceed 1,000 wafer a week production by the end of Q2 fiscal 27. We are on track for that objective. and we expect this output to generate over $2.5 million of revenue per month. And most importantly, we've demonstrated that customer demand for our chip is unwavering across a diverse customer base. As I've mentioned, our capacity is sold out with committed contracts through the end of fiscal 27 and any new capacity coming on board will translate to immediate high margin revenue uplift. Looking ahead, we see three key levers for further expansion. Our first area of focus is increasing output capacity in both our Fremont fab and our manufacturing facility in Vietnam. We began producing qualified samples in August in our Vietnam facility, which were delivered to key customers for evaluation. One key area of focus for us is shifting production from 200 millimeter wafers, shifting production from 150 millimeter wafers to 200 millimeter wafers in our Fremont fab. The efficiency gained from this transition, 200 milliliter wafers have 90% more chips per wafer and will drive a 25% uplift in gross market. And we expect that we're getting production of 200 milliliter wafers in the first half of fiscal 28 and our targeting output of a thousand wafers a week by the end of calendar 28. Third, we see an opportunity to expand into adjacent markets as we discussed earlier, specifically Optical Compute and LiDAR. We have customers today that are live in production and continuing to ramp their monthly demand. And we think these markets are in the early stages of harnessing the power of PLC optical chips. We see these markets as a longer term area of expansion for Enablance, growing throughout fiscal 28, 29 and 30. I'm very pleased with what we accomplished in Fiscal 26 and believe we are extremely well positioned to execute on our growth plan as we look into Fiscal 27 and beyond. With that, I'd like to turn over our call to our CFO, Steve Cohen, and discuss our financial results. Steve?

Thanks, Todd. I'm excited to be here today. I joined Enablance in July of this year, and the excitement around the opportunity here is evident. It's been a great first few months of learning and ramping, and I look forward to what's ahead for Enablance. I'll start with a review of our Q4 and fiscal 2026 results before turning to 2027 guidance. Before I get into the results, I would note that all currency-based metrics shared are in U.S. dollars, and all financial comparisons are year-over-year basis, unless stated otherwise. We had a very good fourth quarter with results that met our guidance provided back in March, tapping off an exceptional year of growth for Enablance. Our ability to ramp production at our Fremont fab enabled us to grow across all of our businesses. At the same time, our meaningful year-over-year improvement in gross margin reflects our ability to drive top-line growth with minimal incremental overhead. We believe this demonstrates the inherent leverage in our model which will enable us to drive long-term shareholder value as we continue to scale. Moving on to the numbers, revenue in the fourth quarter totaled $2.9 million, an increase of 38% year over year. Revenue growth was driven by our ongoing expansion in production capacity and we finished Q4 at a run rate of 350 wafer starts per week. Gross margin was 8%, an improvement of 36 percentage points compared to Q4 last year. Q4 marked our second consecutive quarter of positive growth margin as the investments we made in equipment in fiscal 25 are driving leverage in our model. While we are continuing to invest in our capacity and production expansion, we expect gross margin will continue to improve as we scale. Operating loss of $2.9 million improved 8% compared to a loss of $3.1 million in Q4 of last year. Net loss was $6 million compared to a net loss of $5.8 million in Q4 last year. and to recap the full fiscal 2026, revenue grew 37% to $8.1 million. Gross margin for the year was negative 16%, an improvement of 24 percentage points compared to fiscal 2025. Operating loss was $12.7 million compared to a loss of $11.4 million last year, primarily driven Thank you very much. We ended the fourth quarter with cash and cash equivalents of $4.1 million. It's important to note that we closed on a private placement in September, which added $25 million in Canadian dollars to our cash position, net of fees, and is not reflected in this Q4 cash position. We intend to use the proceeds from that offering for capital expenditures to expand capacity and for general corporate purposes, including working capital. We will provide a more updated view on our current cash position at our Q1 earnings announcement. We currently have approximately $64 million in debt outstanding with no bank debt. As part of this total, we have about $25 million in outstanding convertible debt, which is comfortably in the money as of today's discussion. Before I get into our guidance for fiscal 2027, I want to provide some detail around the factors we are taking into consideration as we set our guidance. First, we are continuing to refine production in our Fremont fab, and we expect production to ramp to more than 1,000 wafers per week by the end of the first half of fiscal 2027 as we continue to increase efficiency. Second, as Todd has discussed, our capacity is sold out through the end of fiscal 2027 and production expansion is a critical piece of our growth story. Our assembly plant in Vietnam is production qualified and we expect our vertically integrated end-to-end supply chain to remain a competitive differentiator for us. With that backdrop, for the full year of fiscal 2027, ending June 30th, 2027, we expect revenue to be between $19 million and $21 million, representing nearly growth of 150% year over year at the midpoint. Gross margin is expected to be between 25% and 35%, an improvement of approximately 46% year over year. Additionally, we have begun to close our books for the first quarter of fiscal 2027, which ended September 30th. For Q1, we expect a record quarter for enablements. We estimate revenue in Q1 will total approximately $4 million, an increase of almost 500% compared to Q1 last year. We appreciate you taking the time to join us on our call today. and hope this has been a helpful introduction to the enable and storage. We firmly believe that the future of AI and robotics will be driven by advanced optical solutions, and we are squarely positioned to benefit from these accelerating tailwinds in the years ahead. We look forward to what's on the horizon for enableance. With that, Todd and I will take your questions. Operator?

We will now move to our question and answer session. If you have joined via the webinar, please use the raised hand icon, which can be found at the bottom of your webinar application. When you have been called on, please unmute your line and ask your question. We kindly ask that you limit yourself to one question and one follow up. We will now pause a moment to assemble the queue. Your first question comes from Sebastian Nagy with William Blair. Please unmute and ask your question.

Hi, good afternoon and congrats on hosting your first earnings call here. It's been great to see the capacity progress this year at both Fremont and the new Vietnam site. And it's nice to see you hitting your wafer output targets. As I think about the next target that you set up for yourself, I think you said 1,200 wafers per week, but please correct me if I didn't quite get that. Can you just maybe talk a little bit more about what needs to happen for you to get there over the next 12 months, 18 months? And is that going to be a linear ramp or a little bit more back end loaded? And then I have a quick follow up.

Yeah, so there's two numbers that you're sort of conflating there. One is the thousand away for a week target by the end of this calendar year. And the obstacles to getting to that are really just logistical. The equipment's all production qualified. And we're just working through getting some recipes finally ready. production qualified as well. They have to be reliability tested and other things of that nature. And so in terms of where we stand there, we're currently at a 750 a week run rate and we have peaked at over 900. And so I think we're on track for it. It'll be a challenge. The predominant challenge is just change management inside the FAP itself, getting people used to operating at that higher cadence. Then we have the 1200 number. The 1200 number will be by the end of the fiscal year. This is due to optimizations in the FAB, and it'll be relatively linear throughout the H2 of the fiscal as we refine individual recipes at various points in the FAB.

Got it. Okay, great. That's really helpful. And then just maybe for my follow-up, as we think about this fiscal 2027 guidance, any way to think about the mix between wafers and assemblies, and then in particular, maybe over kind of a multi-year period, I assume assembly should trend higher, but how to think about that mix shift?

Yeah, so for fiscal 27, the mix is going to be predominantly wafers. So think, you know, 85, 90% wafers with a small amount of assemblies as we ramp into that assembly production. And as we look into fiscal 28, that Thank you very much. sales for roughly six dollars and chip sales for roughly a dollar. And so by allocating 20 percent, you get a roughly doubling in revenue. And so at that point, we'll be at a 50 50 distribution between the two. Whether or not we push beyond that is going to be evaluated at the time based upon market demand. If we see a lot of demand coming from North America, and another place through our Vietnam facility, we will increase that ratio. Otherwise, we'll continue to manage it in a way that does not risk our existing customer base.

Got it. Okay, great. That's really helpful, Keller. I appreciate it. Thank you.

Your next question comes from Richard Shannon with Gregg Hallam Group, LLC. please unmute and ask your question.

All right, great, Todd. And Steve, can you hear me? Just want to make sure.

Yes, it is.

OK, great. Thank you. Sorry, I wasn't sure how. I just see an unmute button here, but I think I figured it out. Well, thanks for letting me ask a couple of questions. Congrats on the first earnings call here. I'd love to understand the dynamics here in gross margins. Obviously, we had two quarters in the positive, and you got a very nice gross margin guide for this fiscal year, fiscal 27. Either one of you, I'd love to understand the dynamics by which you get to this, how much of this is volume versus mix, yield, any other dynamics that helps you get to this and the confidence level you have in doing that.

Yes, there are really two primary drivers. One is spreading our fixed costs over a materially larger product or volume base. And so there's a huge amount of margin increase that comes from that. The second is that we are managing our product shift. Given that we are sold out of wafers, we have a wafer allocation process we go through that balances that. existing customers and existing contracts, which are inherently at a lower margin. They tend to have been established months or years previously versus newer customers and newer contracts, which are a higher margin. And so we manage that balance and that's allowing us to capitalize on our pricing power that we're seeing in the market now. as we are able to take advantage of that pricing power, we're seeing our ASP on a per wafer basis come up and we'll continue to manage that increase, that pricing power increase throughout the remainder of fiscal 27.

Okay, great. That's a great detail. Thanks for that, Todd. My second question is on customer diversification. I think you made a brief comment in your prepared remarks, Todd, about that. And given that you talked about fiscal 27 being fully booked, I'd love to get a sense of what that concentration diversification might look like. Do we have a couple, you know, a couple, two, three customers driving majority or just any general characterization of what the level of concentration is? I think most people can understand in the AI market here with communications and transceivers, that's a reasonably concentrated market. So I think people are trying to compare and contrast your exposure to what the market is. Thank you.

Yeah, so I'll leave Steve to talk about the specific margin portion of the question you asked there, but let me touch on the diversification. Today, you're seeing a concentration amongst three customers, and Steve, I think, can talk specifically what the concentration is amongst those three customers. We have a much longer tail, and as I was saying, we're balancing our allocation, our product allocation, we're using to balance across are high volume existing customers and our emerging customers with the intention to more balance that revenue out. As you see us step into the assemblies, Those are really an entirely new customer set as we're taking out for North American sales, we're taking a tier of the value chain out of the equation. And as a result, you'll see more than a doubling of our key customer base and they'll each occupy roughly half of our total revenue. You know, the assembly customers and the key assembly customers and the key wafer customers. As far as the top three, Steve, you want to reflect on exactly what that capacity or concentration is?

Yeah, there's three customers that make up about 90% of the business. One of our customers, EULA, is about 68% of the business. So we continue to... work with them, as Todd said, allocate and look for other customers. And as we address our product mix going forward, that customer mix is going to be a little bit more flattened, certainly as we get into the assemblies.

Okay, perfect. That's great characterization. Thanks for letting me ask questions. I'll jump out of line.

Your next question comes from Toby LaBelle with Northland Capital Markets. Please unmute your audio and ask your question.

Hey, congratulations, guys, on your first quarter here that you're out. And my name is Toby Piper LaBelle. I'm with Northland Capital Markets. Question about your balance sheet. Do you have a strategy about recapping and optimizing your debt to lower the interest burden?

Steve, you want to take that one?

Yes, yes, great question. You know, as I said, I've been with the company and mentioned in my opening statement since July and eyes wide open on the balance sheet and certainly optimizing our capital structure. The, you know, about 20, about 40% of the debt on the balance sheet is convertible. Debt. So that becomes an option for us. And also, some of the higher cost interest is also on our books with participants that have invested in the company. So it's definitely line of sight for us. And we think certainly with the growth of the organization and the margin improvement that we're going to have a lot of avenues to shore up the balance sheet.

Yeah, Toby, I'll just add on there. I would say that over the next nine months, clearly it is a high priority of leadership to clean up the balance sheet in a way that puts us in favorable positions for future growth cycles.

Thanks, guys.

Your next question comes from the line of Daniel Rosenberg with Paradigm Capital. Please unmute your audio and ask your question.

Hi, Todd and Steve. Thanks for taking my question. My first one comes around working capital requirements. So obviously your guidance is pointing to substantial growth here. Could you speak to some of the needs and how we should think about working capital as you guys scale into these larger numbers?

Steve? Yeah, yeah, thank you. So, you know, as we mentioned in our opening statements, we just received an infusion and it's certainly been public for about 25 million Canadian dollars from the Collingwood Group. and that's going to help us and continue to allow us to grow certainly for the next three to four quarters and we will start generating positive cash at that point in time. Again, as Todd mentioned, once the fab and once our productivity starts to increase, we're going to see margin accretion along the way and we'll be able to cover our working capital internally. We are looking to, as we get into a better position as a company, to negotiate a little bit better with our suppliers because of scale. We're also working with our customers on terms. So that's a priority for us over the next, certainly next couple of quarters to optimize it. And then we're going to be generating enough cash as well to sustain a strong working capital going forward.

One point of clarification there, as it might have been misconstrued given how Steve laid it out. We will be cash flow positive in Q3 fiscal 27, not at the end of the period as you might have read his statement, so.

Okay, thanks for that. And then thinking about the scaling opportunity you have, as you move to 200 millimeter sizes, I'm wondering, how de-risked is that process, you know, operationally? and technologically, et cetera. Can you speak to just the steps needed to get there and how confident you are in your ability to do so? And then I'll pass the line. Thank you.

Great, thank you, Daniel. Yeah, so the 200 millimeter is obviously critical from a margin standpoint. It has a huge, huge lever. And so when we went into purchasing equipment, we purchased all equipment that is 200 millimeter capable. and when we looked for a partner to inject our recipes into their fab in this case polar we also looked for a 200 millimeter partner and so we have been working for over two years to get through the complicated recipe modifications that are required to make that jump in wafer size As a result, we've de-risked the majority of that transition in-house. The only blocker at this point, we have our first dedicated 200 millimeter anneal furnace. It has not been production qualified yet. We've been working on it for several months and we are at the final age. The tail end of getting it production qualified. At that time, you will see us begin in earnest transferring the recipe modifications from polar back into our fab and we will start releasing 200 millimeter wafers for customer evaluation in Q4 fiscal 27. with initial production and low scale production out of our fab. I think one day a week is what it will largely be in Q1. And then we'll expand likely to three day a week, 200 millimeter production in Q2 of fiscal 28. And then we'll be able to cut over to probably five days a week for Q3 The remaining two days a week will be a challenge. There'll be a set of customers that will refuse to make that transition for a period of time. We will allow that, and then there'll come a point in time which we will say we're end-of-lifing that product, but that likely won't be until the beginning of fiscal 29 that we will pull out that hammer.

So you can kind of see it's largely de-risked for us, and

The plan is well established and I expect it to execute on the timeline we've laid out.

Thanks for that and congrats on all the progress.

Thanks, Daniel.

This concludes our Q&A session. If you have any additional questions, please reach out to management directly. Thank you for participating in today's conference. You may now disconnect.