Hello and welcome to Newmont's third quarter 2026 results conference call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Newmont's Group Head of Treasury and Investor Relations, Neil Backhouse. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Rebecca. Hello, everyone, and thank you for joining Newmont's third quarter 2026 earnings call. Joining me today are Natascha Viljoen, our president and chief executive officer, Brian Tabolt, our executive vice president and chief financial officer, as well as other members of our management team who will be available to answer questions at the end of the call. Before we begin, please take a moment to review our cautionary statements shown here and refer to our SEC filings, which can be found on our website. With that, I'll turn the call over to Natascha.

Thank you, Neil. And hello, everyone. Newmont delivered a stable third quarter, demonstrating the quality, resilience, and value generation capacity of our world-class portfolio. Robust safety and operational performance, disciplined cost management, and higher silver production with realized prices enabled us to improve our full year cost guidance while remaining firmly on track to achieve our production, capital, and other guidance metrics. I want to start with our operational performance. In the third quarter, Newmont safely produced approximately 1.3 million ounces of gold, 23,000 tons of copper, and a notable 11 million ounces of silver. As we indicated last quarter, gold production was broadly in line with the second quarter and reflected strong execution across the portfolio. This operational performance translated into strong financial results, including $1.9 billion of free cash flow and an adjusted net income of $2.20 per share, representing a third quarter record. This strong cash generation continues to support our balanced approach to capital allocation. Since our last earnings call, we have returned approximately $1.9 billion to shareholders, Thank you for joining us today. Thank you for joining us. Thank you very much. at Lihir we safely completed the planned September shutdown on schedule and according to plan we continue to expect higher grade or in the fourth quarter as planned and finally at Redcrest we are finalizing the feasibility study for the Blockhive project and continue to advance toward a full funds decision early next year and I will provide more detail a little bit later As we move beyond the production trough previously indicated for in 2026, we expect production growth to begin in 2027. Looking further ahead, our portfolio of operating assets, projects in execution and future development opportunities position Newmont to grow and sustain production for decades to come. Supporting both our near-term production growth and longer-term outlook is the progress we continue to make advancing our projects across the portfolio. In the third quarter, we continue to advance our development pipeline, achieving key milestones across multiple projects. Most notably, at the second expansion at Tanami, we have now completed construction on the 1.5km shaft. We remain on track for full mechanical completion by the end of this year and our focus will shift towards commissioning as we move into 2027. We now expect commercial production by the end of the second quarter of 2027, earlier than previously anticipated, with ramp-up activities continuing to the end of the year. At KDRPC 2.3, we remain on track for completion by the end of this year with the final drawbell fired in September. This represents an important milestone as we begin transitioning activities from the project teams to operations. At PC1-2, cave establishment activities continue to advance on schedule, and we are pleased to report that the key regulatory approvals and associated requirements following the April seismic event have been achieved, allowing the project to continue advancing towards cave establishment. The two water treatment plants at Yanacocha are progressing well and are approaching mechanical completion with commissioning activities underway. As these projects advance towards completion in 2027, closure spending is expected to be approximately $200 million lower in 2027 and $400 million lower in 2028 compared with 2026 levels. As this cash flow becomes available, it will be reallocated to growth, partially offsetting an increase in development capital as we continue to invest in future projects and opportunities across our portfolio that generates the highest returns. These project milestones reinforce our confidence in Newmont's proven ability to execute large, complex projects across jurisdictions safely, responsibly, and on schedule. With this capability and confidence, we are advancing the Red Cross Block Cave project, a fully permitted, shovel-ready gold-copper development in British Columbia's Golden Triangle, and the next major reinvestment in our business, directly supporting our strategy to lead in gold and grow in copper. With a full funds decision anticipated early next year, Reckless is positioned to deliver long-term production in one of the industry's premier mining jurisdictions. Reckless is a multi-phase project, anchored by an endowment that supports 70 years of mine life. It represents a rare combination of scale, quality, and growth, located within a highly prospective porphyry district. With all our regulatory and consent-based approvals already in place, it benefits from strong partnerships with the Taltan nation and support from both provincial and federal governments, demonstrated by the Government of Canada's announcement of $500 million Canadian dollars of funding for the project, recognising its importance to Canada's critical mineral strategy. Thank you very much. It's important to note that while the initial phase, Macro Block 1-2, represents less than 20% of potential mine life at Redcrest, approximately 40% of the planned investment in processing facilities, material handling systems and other key infrastructure is expected to support future expansions. This foundation positions Redcrisp to evolve into an increasingly meaningful contributor to Newmont's future production profile and a significant driver of shareholder value over time. We continue to refine and validate the underlying assumptions and execution plan with a clear focus on ensuring the Redcrisp Lockhive project meets our investment criteria and project execution standards. While final review and governance work remain underway, I'm encouraged by the project economics and the value this operation can create for Newmont. We have completed a rigorous feasibility study and advanced engineering beyond 60%, resulting in an optimized mine design that improves metal recovery and incorporates geotechnical learnings, execution, and long-term operational experience into our plan. Bison results from the feasibility study and subject to board approval. Construction for the project is anticipated to ramp up in 2027 with commercial production targeted for 2033. This builds upon the early works that have already advanced the main decline, conveyor to surface decline, and ventilation rise boring. Thank you very much. Following ramp-up, we expect Request to produce an estimated 275,000 to 325,000 ounces of gold annually, along with 65,000 to 85,000 tons of copper per year, highlighting the quality of the initial cave. We currently estimate development capital to be between 4.2 and 4.8 billion US dollars. which is equivalent to 5.6 and 6.4 billion Canadian dollars on a 100% basis and includes the benefit from the anticipated grant from the Canadian government This estimate reflects the latest development plan, updated productivity assumptions, current market inputs, and a mature understanding of the infrastructure, development sequence, capital requirements, and operating profile required to successfully deliver the project. Supported by a robust technical plan and refined execution strategy, we believe Red Cross is well positioned to meet our investment criteria. As we move towards a final investment decision, I want to spend a moment to reflect on the principles that will guide that decision. Regardless of the source of growth, whether advancing the next phase of an existing operation, evaluating an organic development project, or assessing any potential inorganic opportunity, every investment must compete for capital and satisfy three core criteria. Thank you very much. Secondly, the investment must ensure the quality of the portfolio. We focus on opportunities that support durable production profiles, typically with mine lives of 10 years or more, improve free cash flow generation, increase resilience through the commodity cycles, and strengthen the portfolio's overall cost competitiveness. and finally the economics must be compelling and supported by a high degree of technical maturity, project execution capability and a clear development plan. We expect projects to remain competitive across a range of planning assumptions and commodity price environments while generating a double digit internal rate of return that exceeds the applicable country specific discount rate. The initial phase at Redcrest is an example of this approach in action. It aligns with our strategy, enhances the quality and longevity of our portfolio and delivers compelling returns while meeting the same rigorous standards we apply to every investment before capital is allocated. With that, I will turn it over to Brian for an update on our third quarter financial performance and outlook for the rest of the year.

Thank you, Natascha, and hello, everyone. Newmont delivered another quarter of robust financial results, supported by stable operational performance, disciplined cost management, and continued execution across our portfolio. We realized an average gold price of $4,317 per ounce, generated $2.8 billion of cash flow from operations after working capital, and delivered $1.9 billion of free cash flow. through the first nine months of the year we have generated 7.3 billion dollars of free cash flow which is approximately the total amount generated in 2025 and with our strongest production quarter yet to come reflecting our continued ability to convert strong operational execution into meaningful cash generation and shareholder value This strong cash flow continues to underpin our capital allocation framework, enabling us to return more than 80% of free cash flow to shareholders year to date, while making meaningful reinvestment back into the business and maintaining a strong balance sheet. For the quarter, we also generated $4 billion of adjusted EBITDA and reported adjusted net income of $2.20 per share. As we noted on our last call, the working capital benefit realized in the second quarter partially unwound during the third quarter, reflecting normal timing-related working capital movements across the business. Turning to costs, gold all-in sustaining costs were $1,454 per ounce on a byproduct basis. Unit costs improved sequentially from the second quarter. primarily reflecting higher gold and co-product volumes, including 11 million ounces of silver production, stronger realized copper prices, and lower operating costs at certain operations across the portfolio. Turning now to our capital allocation priorities. We continue to apply the capital allocation framework introduced earlier this year consistently, balancing reinvestment in our world-class portfolio, financial flexibility, and the return of excess cash to shareholders. Beginning with sustaining capital, we spent $525 million in the third quarter as we continued to reinvest in the business to support safe production and sustainable free cash flow generation. Turning to our sustainable cash dividend, our framework targets an annual cash dividend of approximately $1.1 billion paid quarterly, and in the third quarter, we declared a dividend of $0.26 per share. We also continue to invest in development capital, spending $354 million to advance the highest return opportunities within our deep organic growth pipeline. At the same time, we remain committed to maintaining a flexible and resilient balance sheet anchored by our net cash target of $1 billion, plus or minus $2 billion. This range provides the flexibility to manage through commodity price cycles while continuing to invest in the business and return capital to shareholders. We ended the quarter with net cash balance of $3.2 billion, which is modestly above the upper end of our target range. It's important to note that this balance does not yet reflect the anticipated $1.95 billion payment associated with the amended Nevada Goldmines Joint Venture Agreement, which we expect to close in the fourth quarter. And finally, once these priorities have been met, excess cash is allocated to ongoing share repurchases. Since our last earnings call, we have repurchased approximately $1.6 billion of shares under the $6 billion share repurchase program authorized by the board in April. This includes more than $450 million of shares repurchased in October to date, leaving approximately $2.8 billion remaining under the current authorization. Our approach to repurchasing shares over time is already having a meaningful impact. and as Natascha mentioned earlier, since we began executing our repurchase programs in February of 2024, we have reduced our share count by more than 115 million shares or approximately 10% of shares outstanding. And as I mentioned last quarter, based on the repurchases completed to date, the formula under our framework would support a quarterly dividend of 27 cents per share at the next annual review while maintaining the same targeted annual cash commitment. Any increase would remain subject to approval and declaration by the board as part of its annual review next February, but we continue to execute the program consistently, reflecting our conviction that Newmont shares continue to represent an attractive long-term investment opportunity. Turning to guidance. As we look to the remainder of 2026, we remain well on track to achieve our full year production guidance. Production is expected to increase in the fourth quarter to 1.4 million ounces, making it our strongest quarter of the year, driven primarily by four of our managed operations. At Tanami, as we begin to access higher-grade stopes. At Cerro Negro, the start of mining at the vein zone open pit, as well as continued productivity improvements and recoveries. At O'Hafla North, as the operation continues to ramp up to full production rates. and at Lahir as we begin to access higher grade ore as planned following the September maintenance shutdown. I do want to call out that while we continue to expect Lahir to be a strong contributor in the fourth quarter, we are closely monitoring potential water impacts as a result of El Nino conditions, which are forecast to strengthen through November and December before beginning to ease in the first quarter of next year. We are actively managing the operation with these conditions in mind and working to mitigate with water conservation efforts. though the timing and severity of weather impacts could influence production and costs during the quarter. Turning to costs, continued operational execution, disciplined cost management, and stronger realized prices for copper, silver, and other co-products have enabled us to improve our full-year cost outlook and now expect gold all-in sustaining costs of approximately $1,520 per ounce, representing an improvement of approximately 10% relative to the guidance we provided at the beginning of the year. While we continue to expect fourth quarter all-in sustaining costs to be the highest of the year at approximately $1,900 per ounce, our improved full-year outlook reflects the strength of our year-to-date performance and provides increased confidence in our ability to manage costs within our control. The fourth quarter cost profile primarily reflects the planned timing of sustaining capital spend, lower co-product credits as silver production at Penesquito declines to approximately half of third quarter levels, and ongoing inflationary pressures, including fuel-related impacts. With these evolving fuel-related considerations, we have enhanced our oil price sensitivity disclosure, which can be found in the appendix of our presentation. In addition to the approximate $60 million impact from direct fuel consumption, we estimate a further additional approximate $50 million impact that key consumables and inputs for every $10 per barrel change in oil prices, providing a more comprehensive view of the potential cost impacts across our business. Finally, sustaining and development capital are expected to be the highest in the fourth quarter, keeping us on track to achieve our full year capital guidance expectations. Looking beyond the current year, we expect total portfolio production in 2027 to increase by a low to mid single digit percentage compared with 2026. Within our managed portfolio, the principal drivers include higher grade at Lahir and Boddington, supported by planned mine sequencing and the completion of the waste stripping campaign at Boddington this year. Additional ounces from Tanami, with the second expansion progressing well toward commercial production. incremental ounces at Cerro Negro through the introduction of ore feed from the vein zone open pit and at Yonacocha continued operational success as supporting the evaluation of additional low-cost ounces in 2027 and potentially beyond. Together these contributions provide a clear line of sight to production growth beginning in 2027. Shifting to costs, the fourth quarter profile provides an early indication of several external factors that we continue to monitor and are currently expecting to carry into next year, ultimately impacting our anticipated 2027 cost estimates. Based on current conditions, we anticipate unit costs to trend higher next year, reflecting macroeconomic headwinds and lower co-product credits. primarily from reduced silver production at Penesquito where output is expected to be roughly 30% lower than 2026 levels due to planned mine sequencing. While these factors create a more challenging cost environment, we remain focused on rigorous cost discipline, productivity improvements, and performance excellence across the business, ensuring we continue to actively manage the costs that are within our control. Looking at capital investment for next year, sustaining capital is expected to remain largely in line with 2026 levels as we continue investing in the long-term reliability and performance of our world-class portfolio of operations. We now expect development capital in 2027 to be approximately $500 million higher than 2026, primarily reflecting planned investment in the Red Criss Block Cave project, subject to board approval, and continued advancement of the Leher Near Shore Barrier project. Importantly, as Natascha mentioned, approximately $200 million of the increase in development capital spend in 2027 is expected to be offset by cash flow becoming available as spending on the Yonacocha water treatment plants declines. As the project reaches completion, this benefit is expected to increase to approximately $400 million annually beginning in 2028. Taken together, these preliminary indications reflect a portfolio positioned for a return to production growth in 2027, supported by continued operating discipline and selective investment in our highest return opportunities. With that, I'll turn the call back to Natascha for closing remarks.

Thank you, Brian. In closing, our third quarter results demonstrate the strength of Newmont's world-class portfolio and the consistency of execution across our business. We remain firmly on track to achieve our 2026 production capital and improved cost guidance supported by strong operational performance, disciplined cost management and continued free cash flow generation. The strength of our portfolio allows us to simultaneously reinvest in the business, maintain a resilient balance sheet and return significant capital to shareholders through our capital allocation framework. Thank you very much. and with that, we look forward to your questions.

We will now begin the question and answer session. We ask that you please limit inquiries to one primary question and one follow-up question. If you would like to ask a question, please press star then one to raise your hand. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your question, press star then one again. At this time, we will pause to assemble our roster. Your first question comes from Daniel Major with UBS. Daniel, please go ahead.

Hi, Natascha, Brian, and congratulations. A good set of numbers and no curveballs from the 27 guidance that I can see. But yeah, I guess the first one, just looking at the Redcrisp project and the preliminary details that you've given, Can you provide us a little bit more detail on the scope changes that you talked to as sort of the first part? And then secondly, you talked to this as being the first sort of phase that is the foundation for further expansions. Can you also just provide a little bit more color about what that kind of would entail and the potential timeframe around that?

Thank you, Daniel, and some really, really good questions. So I think it's firstly important to recognize that this project now is for the first time on a technical and commercial level, fully on a right feasibility study level. So as we think about scope changes, it's important to also think about the technical executability and long-term sustainability of the project. So the scope changes certainly included our increase and improved understanding of geotechnical realities. It allowed us to make sure that the positioning and the design of the cave plus the operational infrastructure and materials handling is appropriately positioned in areas that can be supported in the long term. and that does allow for long-term productivity in high levels of productivity to support the low cost expectations of this project. Secondly, we see increased throughput through the plant that allows us for higher yearly plant throughputs and then associated with the right tidings capacity. So those are the major changes. We have then also made sure that from a project execution point of view that we reflect current and demonstrated development performance as well as really current rights for that development. Then if we look at the future of this endowment, Daniel, on slide five, you will see that we've clearly marked out the first macro block one and two. My apologies, I think it might be slide six. I want you to firstly look at both the east and west expansion of the ore body and you will see that macro block one and two is positioned in a very small portion of what we currently see as our endowment. Our endowment includes everything from our east reach to the far west and does not include any exploration potential further to the east and the west as all bodies still open to the east and the west. So the 70 years that we're talking about is within the context of what you can see on the slide. The next expansion would be logical to go into MB3 and then Eastreach after that. Those project development evaluations is underway as we speak. And as we bring them to a more mature phase, we will certainly be able to share more information. I might just add and remind you that 40% of the capital that we're spending now will be capital that would be appropriate for further extensions into Macro Block 3 and Eastridge.

Okay, thanks. Sorry, just to clarify on that. When you say 40% of capital, do you mean mine development capital rather than surface infrastructure?

No, it would be between surface infrastructure and underground materials handling infrastructure that would be reused for future expansions.

Okay, that's clear. Thank you. And then second question, and thanks for the colour on the drivers of the sort of production into next year. Could you put a bit more colour on the expectations around Yanacocha? Obviously, production's coming off, but it appears that's continue to contribute more than you previously guided. Can you give us an update on how you see that both 2027 and beyond?

Daniel, firstly, I think it's important to bring us back to the asset reviews that we have done that allowed us to stand back and unconstrained look at every asset. Yanakocha has benefited from that process in that as we had an unconstrained view on the potential of the asset, definitely supported by a change in assets. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. in terms of heap leach capacity, no material capital investment, opened up additional opportunities in the open pit that we will be exploring to extend the life of that asset.

Great. Thanks very much.

Your next question comes from the line of Fahad Tariq with Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Hi, thanks for taking my question. I wanted to ask a little bit more about the indirect impact of the oil prices, and thanks for providing that sensitivity. Can you just clarify whether that includes any impact on labor cost inflation? Thanks.

Yeah, hi, Fahad. No, it does not. The primary impact associated with the indirect impacts that we've incorporated in that $50 million is associated with chemicals, Explosives, Grinding Media, Fixed Plant, a bit of the contracted services in terms of how those dynamics flow through contracted services. But in terms of the primary employee base, that's not included as part of the labor assumption.

Okay. And then just my follow-up question, what are you seeing in terms of labor cost inflation? And if you can maybe speak to, you know, we've heard about labor market tightness, particularly in Nevada and Western Australia. Maybe just comment on what you're seeing there in terms of availability. Thanks.

Yeah, I mean, I think in terms of labor cost assumption, we are looking at a general escalation across the organization that will exceed our 2026 assumption, which was about 3%. So I think that that's probably a good place to start grounding in terms of just general costs, in terms of inflationary pressures. And I think a lot of us are all monitoring the general cost environment and I think a recognition in showing the indirect impacts of oil is a bit of a recognition that we are seeing a bit more of that stickiness associated with diesel prices and not just the oil price but also the crack spread in terms of how that's impacting diesel and how that's flowing through the inflationary dynamic across the economy. I think also with regards to costs, there are other dynamics that we're monitoring as it relates to the Australian dollar. and the continued royalty sensitivity is driven by gold price. But in terms of labor costs itself, I think that the indicator right now would be that more general inflationary environment. And we're continuing to monitor it. Natascha, I don't know if there's anything additionally you might add in terms of availability of labor across the business.

Thanks, Brian. Fahad, generally, we know that the industry is always looking for technical capabilities. So technical capabilities, certainly the first area that we always very careful around talent management and attracting and retention of good technical capability. If I look at across our business, our LIBOR turnover is within good control and we don't by and large see any major LIBOR shortages.

Great, thank you. Thanks, Vaughan.

Your next question comes from the line of Richard Garchiturna with Barclays. Please go ahead.

Great. Thanks, everybody. My first question is on the 10 of my Q2 completion in the first half of next year now expected. I'm just wondering how that you expect that to impact cash costs through the 227 and how should we think about that benefiting 27, 28?

Thank you, Richard. And a really good question. We're really pleased with the progress that the team has made at completing the shaft and the infrastructure around the shaft. As we go into commercial production next year, we'll start to see opportunities to open up and develop the areas at depth. It will have a material positive impact in our ability to move or out of underground. As we ramp up 27, we could expect to see Tanamai going back to previous performance into 2028. I think it's important. We'll definitely start to see an impact immediately, but we'll see the full impact as we ramp that asset back up to expected production.

And Richard, I might just add to Natascha's comments as it relates to cash costs. We're not in a position at this point to provide site-level cost guidance, but I would direct you to the general macroeconomic comments that I had, both in the prepared remarks as well as the previous response.

Yeah, I think that's important. We'd be net of macroeconomic, but certainly from a productivity point of view, we'll see that come through. Thanks for that. Okay, thank you.

On Redcrisp, the CapEx guidance, can you talk about how we should think of that flowing through over the next six years of development? I know you raised your CapEx development, CapEx expectations for 27 by 500 million. How much is Redcrisp a part of that? And then will it be fairly linear as you develop the mine or is it more lumpy as you go forward?

Thanks, Richard. I think, firstly, 50% of the expected increase is associated with Redcrest. We certainly have other projects like our Ligure Nearshore Barrier that is also included in that capital increase, which is also a really value-accretive project for us. Until we improve more colour around the project, assuming FID early next year, I think it's safe for you to assume a linear spend profile. But certainly we'll be able to give you more colour with FID in February.

Great, thank you.

Your next question comes from Tanya Jakuskanek with Scotiabank. Please go ahead.

Oh, great. Good evening. Thank you so much for taking my questions. Natascha, just wanted to come back to Redcrest and trying to reconcile some of the differences of the new Crest feasibility, pre-fees and your feasibility studies. I'm just trying to understand, you said that the processing facility is larger. Can you remind me what size you're thinking and how much larger that was than Newcrest? And also when you think about the ore body itself, are you looking at more caves than they originally had anticipated? Just trying to figure out the discrepancy between the two capitals.

Yes. Tanya, I'll probably touch on a couple of things and thank you for that question because I think that's... That is probably top of mind. Firstly, you've pointed out that the numbers that the numbers that's available was pre feasibility study. And this is now a fully really well developed pre full feasibility study with at least 60 percent of engineering completed. We have in some of our packages much higher levels of engineering completed. I think firstly important learnings for us as I think between 2021-2022 and where we are today. The first learning was certainly around the geotechnical realities around that ore body. We have been able to improve our understanding of the geotech that has resulted in quite material changes Thank you very much. We have been thoughtful on where we position underground infrastructure, both in terms of materials, how to place a material, broader materials handling to ensure that it is in more competent areas in the underground, actually ensuring for long-term sustainability of the use of that infrastructure. So if you just look to ensure stable infrastructure underground in a cave that's not impacted by geotechnical structures. That would certainly be the first element. The second element is we will go from 9 million tonnes per year to 15 million tonnes per year in the processing plant. And that was not part of the original study. I think the last element that I'll touch on as three main elements is we have now got proven evidence development rights as well as cost to ensure that as we think about our capital estimates that we have financial and cost and the financials and cost assumptions are robust as we've developed that the economics around the project.

So if I was to think of those three points that you mentioned so all of the geotech The larger processing facility. And then thirdly, on the inflation, I guess I should say inflation, the present day costing versus I think it's about six years old or thereabout. I forget how long ago that was, five, six years. How would you take that? Like, would you say it's a third each or how would you take these three categories and allocate the discrepancy?

I think what I, Tanya, I think the level of detail that we can give you at this stage, I'm going to limit it to that because we continue to, and as we said in the prepared remarks, we continue to ensure that we understand that we have rigor in our underlying assumptions. We are currently going through our technical review, our financial review, and when we get it through to FID, we'll be able to give you more detail.

Okay. And any change in the ore body itself, like when you looked at it from a caving standpoint, besides the geotechnicals, or did you extend additional caves beyond what they had?

No, I think the caves, the major change is the orientation of macro block one. And then as we continue the work on the extended orbit, we'll continue to develop our thinking there.

Your next question comes from the line of Hugo Nicolacci with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Oh, hi, Natascha and team. Congrats on continuing to deliver in a not so easy operating environment. Firstly on Lahir, I just wanted to dig into your comments on the potential for an El Nino impact to water availability at site. In the release you talk about the potential risks in the fourth quarter this year but can you just give a bit more detail around where you see the potential for water availability into next year just given Lahir is one of the key drivers of production growth and what you're doing to mitigate that risk there?

Thank you and hello Hugo, a really good question. So firstly, important to note that we have not been impacted yet. It is something that we are closely monitoring due to just our normal water storage areas. I think it's important to note that the expectation is for El Niño to increase and get harsher towards the end of the year. and probably we'll see less of that but going into the new year. A couple of priorities for us here. Firstly, on the Lear Island, the communities are reliant on us for water distribution. So that will be without a doubt our first priority. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. I probably just want to, on a little bit more of a broader context, also remind you that the benefit of having a portfolio of assets is that not all of the assets are constrained with the same headwinds. And if you consider this here, we had Boddington bushfires, we had Tanami bushfires, we had seismic events at Kadia, we had a number of headwinds. but with the benefit of a global portfolio, we do have opportunity to offset certain headwinds.

Great. Thanks for that, Natascha. That's helpful, Carla. And then sort of dovetailing nicely into my second question then, good to see KDO PC1 to cave establishments have resumed, but this is maybe added sort of six months or so delay to timing to ramping that up later this decade. On your point around that portfolio flexibility, how to just talk to where that flexibility might be to continue to support the group getting back to that six million ounce target and where flexibility Acadia might be to catch up some of that timing?

So, Hugo, firstly, as we've worked through the rehabilitation work, the agreement with the regulator, we have been, and I think we've commented this in previous sessions, that we are working to mitigate any potential impact on the project, and we have actually been able to do that. So, as I said in my prepared remarks, BC1-2 is on schedule. We are back with the development and at least up to the point that we get to hydraulic radius. I think that's just from a BC1-2 point of view and BC2-3 on track as I've commented on. So those two projects well in hand. If we look a little bit longer term on how we build back to our 6 million ounces, I think Brian in his prepared remarks did touch on Q4. I'll probably just touch on a little bit longer dated. Here we are starting to move into hybrid areas as we've committed to do. We've completed the engineered wall at phase 24 and we're also going into a different phase, phase 19 all with higher grade. Boddington as we've committed to has completed its stripping and additional pushbacks so Boddington is in higher grade areas and Tanami will go into higher grade areas as well. On a previous question, I've commented on Yonacocha and the additional opportunities that we see at Yonacocha. And lastly, we'll start to see CNE1, the Sierra Negra expansion project, as well as Vine Zone, the open pit that we opened and we actually intersected some early low-grade ore reading. We'll see that coming through. And then on our non-managed partners, both in NGMPV and Fruit Total Norte, there's an indication, indicated growth that we are assuming their forecasts as well. So I think we are well set up. to build back to the 6 million ounces. And then projects like Redcris will then secure that longer-term sustaining of a really robust production profile.

Thanks, Natasha. That's helpful, Boston.

Thanks, Julien. Your next question comes from Lawson Winder with Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Thank you very much, Operator. And hello, Natascha and team, and thank you for today's update. Great quarter. Could I ask about your 2026 year-end reserve and resource planning? And, you know, just as you think of all the different moving parts, so 2,000 per ounce gold price assumption used last year, what are you thinking would be an appropriate gold price assumption for year-end 2026? How might the Lahira and Cerro Narro life extensions play into this? and then just overall commentary on whether Newmont anticipates replacing reserves at year end 2026. And maybe actually one other question to kind of fit in along with this theme is, do you anticipate any impact on CADIA's reserves as a result? I mean, I gather from your prior response that that's not the case, but I think just specifically with respect to reserves, not resources, do you anticipate any impact? Thank you.

Lewis and Harvey, we didn't clearly hear your third question. You had our assumptions around resources. The last one was around Calia reserves. The second and the third question, you didn't come through clear. If you don't mind repeating those, please.

Yeah, and I apologize for that. But just the basic gist of the question is, does Newmont ultimately anticipate replacing reserves at and what are some of the moving parts around that including gold price and the various operating changes at some of the assets?

Okay, so Brian will take your reserve process question and I'll jump in straight after.

Thanks, Austin. I think as it relates to the pricing considerations for reserves and resources, I think we've shared in the past, we tend to be grounded in looking at the three-year trailing average. Obviously, a lot of different dynamics that have gone on over the course of the last three years. So we do take that into consideration as well in terms of the volatility of gold price. But I'd say that that's a good anchor to note. And so we will anticipate as a result, a bit of an increase in terms of the reserve and resource and many others. So that's a bit of flavor of what I would share with you with regards to kind of where we're at from a process perspective. But you can anticipate a bit of an increase in the core price.

I think your following question to that was how does that impact our thinking about Cerro Negro, Vine Zone and Yanacocha? I think important and Lawson, I think we've had a little bit of a conversation about this before. Resorts and Reserves, we're also quite conservative about where we think about mine design optimization for productivity of mine design and any near or short-term low capital opportunities like Bainzone and Yanakorcha. We do take a different approach to thinking about gold price and we do consider near-term gold price. Both of these instances is no real capital allocation opportunity Quick answers, it's a quick turnaround that should be able to benefit from the higher gold price environment that we are seeing at the moment. Your question around Cadeo, no, it would not impact the incidents that we've had, will not impact our reserve assumptions around Cadeo.

Okay, that's great. Thank you very much.

Thanks, Lucerne. Your next question comes from Daniel Morgan with Baron Joey. Please go ahead.

Hi, Natascha. Back to Red Chris. The returns in IRR of double-digit given, is that just for the first 13 years and I presume only macro block one, two, i.e. is there any benefit from future caves including that, i.e. macro block three? Would you leverage the same crusher for macro block three? I'm just trying to marry up there's obviously a lot of life and mind infrastructure which happens in phase one but perhaps you haven't got the benefits and the returns just trying to understand that thank you

Daniel, I think that's a good assumption. As we indicated, about 40% of the capital that we spend is for infrastructure that will benefit future blockhouse. These economics will assume 100% of the capital. That's part of our standard. So this project needs to be standalone, have the right economics on a standalone basis. I think that's important. So certainly we'll be able and perhaps the way you can think about it is just to look at the benefit that we see at Kaidea, where we have similar benefits of using shared infrastructure across future caves and the economics just continue to improve.

Yeah, thank you. And just to ask about the funding. I see that you're looking to plan it. Obviously you've got a very strong balance sheet. What are the rights you have under your JV partner agreement and might you contemplate investment more than potentially your 70% interest and get a higher proportion of the project? Thank you.

Daniel, we are in discussion with our partner and they have full visibility of the project capital and we're working closely with them as they run it through their relevant processes.

Okay, thank you, Natascha, for your perspectives.

Thanks, Daniel. Your next question comes from Adam Baker with Macquarie. Please go ahead.

Hi Natascha and team, thanks for the opportunity. Just during the quarter you've reached an agreement with Barrick to bend four mile lengths in the Nevada JB for US $1.95 billion. Just wondering how you can give us some color to how these discussions came about, including the timing, why now, and also how you landed on the $1.95 billion, because this optically appeared to be a great deal for you guys. Thank you.

Adam, The final agreement had a number of different components. As you've pointed out, we had formal mic and fiber line that was contributed to the joint venture agreement. We had the opportunity to relook the agreement also from a governance point of view and an opportunity for us as joint venture partners to work Thank you very much. with a modernized agreement and I think a really bright outlook for the asset.

All right, I'll let you know. Thank you.

Thanks, Adam. Your next question comes from Martin Pradier with Veritas Investment Research. Please go ahead.

Thank you for taking my question. So my question is on depreciation. The depreciation here today has been 1,870 million rounding, so about 630 million per quarter. You are guiding 2,815, which implies that roughly you have to get 950 million in the last quarter. Is that realistic, or should I think that it should be more like the previous quarters? And the second question would be on the remediation work. You have in the nine months 358 million and the guidance is 385. So you have very little left. So if you can provide some guidance on those two items. Thank you.

Yeah, Martin, thanks for the question. As it relates to the depreciation, the way I would think about that is we mentioned that we do have our highest production quarter in the fourth quarter. So naturally, there will be a bit more depreciation coming off. Thank you for joining us. On the remediation and reclamation, if I'm thinking of what you're referring to as it relates to Yonacocha water treatment plants, we are, as I think we mentioned in the prepared remarks, quite pleased in terms of where the water treatment plants are relative to their construction and their readiness. And so some of that's reflected in the year-to-date spend. We're well on pace as it relates to closing those projects out and getting them compliant in 2027.

So you'll be close to that $385 million guidance or you'll be well ahead of that? That's really that.

Okay, sorry. If it's related to the accretion, this would be tied to a core accretion. What you may be seeing is that there's an element of remediation liability that we booked in the third quarter as it relates to our midnight mine operation in the state of Washington. And that's a bit of a one-off. It's not related specifically to accretion. Oh, okay. Thanks, Martin.

Your next question comes from Anita Soni with CIBC World Markets. Please go ahead.

Thanks for taking my question. My apologies if this has been asked before, but I just wanted to understand the transaction with Barrick for 4 Mile. Has that been papered? I understand that it's 30 days from the day that the contract gets written up and that's when you'll have to deliver. Has that happened yet?

No, Anita, that was reflected in the opening remarks. We are on pace to close out the Vendon process, but the payment, you're right, is 30 days after the completion of the Vendon. The Vendon itself has not yet occurred, but we are anticipating it closing in the fourth quarter.

Okay, and then one other question, just on O'Hoffel North. I was just wondering about the ramp-up Sorry, I was just wondering about the ramp up at Ahofo North in the fourth quarter and going into next year. I think it was a little sluggish this quarter compared to my expectations. So just wondering how that evolves over the next four or five quarters.

Yes, Anita, thank you for that question. So we do see as we continue the ramp up Ahofo North moving into higher grade areas into the next quarter. So you will see that continuous increase as we ramp up.

Okay, thank you. That's my question.

Thanks, Anita.

This concludes the question and answer session. I will now turn the call back to Newmont's CEO for closing remarks.

Thank you so much Rebecca and just to say thank you everyone for joining our call today. We always enjoy talking to you and we're excited about the opportunities ahead and we're looking forward to updating you on our great progress next quarter. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.