Good afternoon and welcome to Dental's third quarter 2026 earnings conference call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your touch-tone phone. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. Please note, today's event is being recorded. I'd now like to turn the conference over to Babatunde Cole, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Rocco, and good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for participating in Occidental's third quarter 2026 earnings conference call. On the call with us today are Richard Jackson, President and Chief Executive Officer, Sunil Mathew, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and Ken Dillon, Senior Vice President and President International Oil and Gas Operations. This afternoon, we will refer to slides available on the investor section of our website. The presentation includes a cautionary statement on slide two regarding forward-looking statements that will be made on the call this afternoon. We'll also reference a few non-GAAP financial measures today. Reconcilations to the nearest corresponding GAAP measure can be found in the schedules to our earnings release and on our website. I'll now turn the call over to Richard.

Thank you, Babatunde, and thank you all for joining our call today. This was another strong quarter for Oxy, and I would like to thank our teams for their continued focus on execution and consistent results. This quarter, we exceeded the midpoint of guidance for total company production, delivered strong results in midstream with over $300 million in adjusted pre-tax income, and continue to drive efficiencies across our operations. A key highlight in the third quarter was achieving our $10 billion principal debt milestone, which is an important step in strengthening our financial position and creating additional capacity to deliver value. Last quarter, I shared our pathway to add more than $4 billion of annual sustainable cash flow by 2030, an approximate 95% increase compared to 2025. Importantly, this increase is driven by durable improvements across the business, including oil and gas cost efficiencies, lower decline rates, and lower debt interest. Looking ahead, we remain focused on executing this value improvement plan and on increasing and accelerating both the return on and the return of capital through the cycle. A key part of delivering this value improvement is our ability to unlock more from the subsurface through advanced resource recovery. We were recently able to share and post a more detailed disclosure to demonstrate these capabilities, including our enhanced oil recovery operations. I would like to take a few minutes today to share these highlights before we get into third quarter results. We apply our advanced recovery approach across the portfolio and at every stage of resource recovery, from exploration and subsurface characterization through field development and production. This has resulted in a track record of adding and improving our resources while consistently delivering more production. In U.S. unconventional, our new well performance continues to deliver in both productivity and cost efficiency. Across U.S. Unconventional, our 2025 and 2026 wells have delivered top-tier performance in every basin, with at least 10% above the industry average on a six-month cumulative oil per lateral foot basis. That performance is driven by the detailed, customized subsurface work we do for every drill spacing unit and well. In the Delaware, for example, we've shown that in some areas, increasing the number of wells per bench can deliver the same individual well performance and up to two and a half times the recovery per DSU. We also highlight how we apply the optimal approach for each DSU, whether that is multi-bench co-development or a phased bench development. The aim is to maximize value by aligning our subsurface approach with the right technology, infrastructure, and operating considerations. In conventional EOR, we have over 50 years experience and 2 billion BOE of resource. Most of this resource is across our 1.2 million acre position on the Permian Central Basin platform, where we continue to expand EOR development, leveraging our extensive CO2 infrastructure. This year, our teams also found new ways to add resources and accelerate production through horizontal development in zones we have historically bypassed. Today, we are applying unconventional drilling and frac techniques to these zones and are seeing strong results. To date, in 2026, we have drilled eight conventional grassroots horizontal wells that are competitive in our portfolio with high oil cut production and lower decline. At the same time, we started an EOR sidetrack program to accelerate production in these same reservoirs by leveraging existing wellbores and infrastructure. After starting these sidetracks in late February, we now have drilled approximately 80 so far this year. This dual approach is both lower cost and efficient to further advance this resource opportunity while adding production this year. We have already identified 500 more sidetrack candidates to continue to accelerate production. Additionally, our new conventional horizontal opportunities add more than 200 million BOE of development ready resource with further upside through appraisal and CO2 EOR. In unconventional EOR, we have another 2 billion BOE of resources identified today. Our first three commercial projects are progressing towards injection by 2029 with more than 30 additional development ready opportunities in the pipeline. Over the last 10 years, we've piloted our approach across multiple basins and formations, demonstrating significant oil production uplift and economic miscible gas and CO2 utilization. These pilots have demonstrated approximately 45% uplift with further upside from additional injection. In addition to CO2 EOR, we continue to advance a broader suite of technologies. Where applied together, we see the potential to increase estimated ultimate recovery by 70 to 140 percent per well. Additionally, in the Gulf of America, we are advancing water floods that give us another significant opportunity to recover more from existing fields and infrastructure. We have identified roughly 450 million BOE of water flood resource at less than $40 breakeven, providing more than a decade of development runway today. Importantly, we also continue to outperform our base production. In U.S. onshore operations, we have averaged more than 13,000 BOE per day above our original annual plan in each of the last three years. A key driver of this outperformance is our continued advancement and application of technology and AI across our operations. To date, approximately 9,000 or 68% of our artificial lift wells are under AI surveillance with predictive intelligence, supporting up to 7% annual production uplift and reducing failure frequency by 22% compared to 2023. Together, our advanced recovery technologies and approach help us add and improve resources while continuing to drive cost efficiencies. They also play a significant role in reducing Oxy's overall decline rate from approximately 25% to 20%, supporting our sustainable cash flow improvement plan by 2030. I'll now turn to a few specific third quarter operational highlights. Our teams delivered another strong quarter, building on the operational and financial performance we have seen throughout 2026. Our U.S. onshore business outperformed the midpoint of guidance by 20,000 BOE a day. In New Mexico, we hit record gross operated production of 284,000 BOE per day, up about 23% since January. In the Powder River Basin, we ramped up activity and brought a record 27 wells online in the third quarter, which is more than any prior year. This drove more than 70% production growth compared to the first quarter, with an average net production of 23,000 BOE per day in the third quarter. In the Gulf of America, while third quarter production was affected by a third-party gas pipeline constraint and maintenance, we continued to advance our water flood program. Our first project, the King Dump Flood, began first injection in July, supporting the broader water flood opportunity across our GOA portfolio. In our EOR business, we continue to outperform and accelerate production. Our sidetrack program and conventional horizontals have added 10,000 BOE per day as of the end of the third quarter. This demonstrates how our teams were able to adjust this year as we reallocated capital and expense dollars to this fast track opportunity. As we continue to expand our EOR opportunities, we are also making progress on securing low-cost CO2. We have signed offtake agreements with two project developers to deliver 2 million metric tons per year of anthropogenic CO2, captured from third-party gas processing plants for use in our Permian EOR operations, which represent about 15% of our 2026 purchase CO2. These projects remain subject to final investment decision which is expected early next year and represent tangible steps towards expanding access to low-cost CO2 to support our long-term EOR opportunity. Turning to Stratos, we continue to make progress on the non-technology related repair where we are adding structural supports to the calciner. We've also been making good progress commissioning unit operations. To date, we have captured over 2000 metric tons of atmospheric CO2 as part of building our pellet inventory. We remain on track to begin full plant startup around the end of the year as we transition to operations in 2027. This strong business performance strengthens our pathway towards adding more than $4 billion of annual sustainable cash flow by 2030 through improved capital efficiency, lower costs, and lower decline rates. We are already seeing progress on these key milestones in our plan. This year will remain on track to deliver more than 7% improvement in new oil costs and are tracking towards a 3% improvement in domestic LOE and transportation, despite higher prices for CO2, diesel, and other categories impacted by commodity prices. These improvements, together with higher near-term oil prices, have allowed us to accelerate our balance sheet progress and debt interest savings. We have achieved our $10 billion principal debt milestone and are now establishing a new milestone of $6 billion. As we look towards 2027, under mid-cycle price scenarios, we will have opportunity to make meaningful progress towards our new principal debt milestone and expand our financial capacity for the preferred redemption in August of 2029 and accelerate our broader return of capital opportunities. At lower prices, our sustainable cash flow progress will focus on supporting principal debt reduction and we will continue to make structural improvements across the business to grow a sustainable dividend at $50 WTI. In total, as we continue to execute our plan and improve our sustainable cash flow, we will be increasingly well positioned to deliver value and advance our cash flow priorities. I'll now turn the call over to Sunil to review the financials and to give more detail on these priorities.

Thank you, Richard. In the third quarter, we generated adjusted earnings of $1.91 per diluted share and reported earnings of $1.61 per diluted share. The difference was largely driven by mark-to-market losses in marketing and crude hedges. Continued operational execution and cost discipline combined with higher commodity prices enabled us to generate approximately $2.8 billion of free cash flow. During the quarter, we achieved our $10 billion principal debt milestone, marking another significant step in strengthening Oxy's financial position. We repaid $1.8 billion of principal debt bringing total year-to-date repayments to $10.4 billion while ending the quarter with $3.9 billion of unrestricted cash. This progress gives us additional flexibility as we continue to strengthen our balance sheet and advance our cash flow priorities. Total production averaged 1.43 million BOE per day, exceeding the midpoint of guidance by 7,000 BOE per day. Strong base and new well performance across our U.S. onshore assets drove higher volumes, more than offsetting lower than expected production in the Gulf of America and international. Gulf of America production declined during the quarter as maintenance activities and the third-party gas pipeline constraint required us to temporarily curtail production at certain facilities. Production was fully restored by late October. International volumes were marginally lower, primarily due to a change in gas processing mode to attain rejection at Dolphin. Continued operating efficiencies contributed to lower domestic lease operating expense of $8.54 per BOE, outperforming our guidance for the quarter. Midstream and marketing also outperformed, driven by stronger-than-expected sulfur pricing and sales volumes at Aloson. We also benefited from higher crude marketing margins due to timing impacts of cargo sales and commodity price movements which are offset in mark-to-market. These factors contributed to adjusted pre-tax income of $309 million. Include Permian gas realizations in the oil and gas segment largely offset the impact of narrower Vaha to Gulf Coast spreads on midstream earnings. Looking ahead to the fourth quarter, we expect total company production to range between 1.43 and 1.47 million VOE per day. Our guidance reflects Gulf of America production curtailments related to the third-party gas pipeline constraint, which extended into the fourth quarter, as well as the impact of the hurricane in early October. Excluding temporary downtime impact in the Gulf of America, Our full year production guidance is slightly above the guidance we provided last quarter. Domestic lease operating expense is expected to increase in the fourth quarter due to higher CO2 costs and an increase in short cycle high return work over opportunities. In midstream and marketing, we expect lower gas marketing income as additional Permian gas take away capacity comes online in the fourth quarter along with lower sulfur pricing at Alosa. Our strong third quarter results and improved fourth quarter guidance support full year guidance of $2 billion in adjusted pre-tax income. We expect total company capital spending to be approximately $1.3 billion in the fourth quarter, keeping full year 2026 capital spending within our original guidance range. As Richard shared, We continue to make significant progress strengthening the balance sheet and advancing our sustainable cash flow improvement plan. We achieved our $10 billion principal debt milestone ahead of expectations, accelerating interest expense savings. Consistent with what we have said previously, our focus is to further reduce net debt with a preference to continue lowering principal debt. In line with this framework, we are establishing a new principal debt milestone of $6 billion. Beyond the $6 billion principal debt milestone, we will remain flexible in balancing further principal debt reduction with building cash ahead of the preferred equity redemption in August 2029. We plan to evaluate opportunistic share repurchases once we achieve a net cash position. A sustainable and growing dividend remains a foundational cash flow priority. Last quarter, we announced a second 8% increase to a quarterly dividend for 2026. Future increases will remain measured and disciplined, supported by a strong balance sheet and progress on annual sustainable cash flow improvement. At $6 billion principal debt, A go-forward interest expense run rate will be approximately $400 million or approximately $1 billion lower than our 2025 interest expense, providing the opportunity for durable dividend increases through commodity cycles. As we shared on previous calls, our starting point for 2027 capital spending remains approximately $5.9 billion. At that level of investment, We continue to expect relatively flat production compared to 2026. The program includes continued investment in mid-cycle projects that are expected to reduce our base decline and sustaining capital over time, including Gulf of America water flood projects, Permian EOR, and select international opportunities. These investments are an important part of our plan to lower Oxy's total base decline from approximately 25% to 20% and reduce sustaining capital to approximately $4.5 billion by 2030. We also expect continued well cost and operating efficiencies across oil and gas to contribute to that progress and drive higher sustainable free cash flow. The 2027 program will advance our plan to deliver more than $4 billion of annual sustainable cash flow improvement by 2030, relative to 2025. Based on the initiatives underway, we expect approximately $700 to $800 million of sustainable cash flow improvement in 2027, relative to 2026, including lower interest expense, roll-off of Stratos Capital, and additional oil and gas efficiencies. Combined with the improvement expected in 2026, this would bring our annual sustainable cash flow improvement to approximately $2 billion by year-end 2027, nearly half of our 2030 objective. As we finalize our 2027 plan, we will remain disciplined, flexible, and prepared for market volatility. We will share more on our 2027 capital plan on the fourth quarter call following board approval. I will now turn the call back to Richard for closing remarks.

Thank you, Sunil. We've made meaningful progress this year and our teams continue to execute and outperform as we track towards adding more than $4 billion of annual sustainable cash flow by 2030. Our operational performance, continued cost efficiencies, and achievement of the $10 billion principal debt milestone demonstrate that progress. reaching our next 6 billion milestone will be another important step towards expanding our financial capacity and accelerating the return of capital to shareholders. Ultimately, we're building a business that can perform through the cycles and create increasing and durable value for shareholders. With that, we would like to open it up for questions. As a reminder, Ken and Babatunde are also here with us today for Q&A.

Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star then 1 on your touchtone phone. If you are using a speakerphone, we ask that you please pick up your handset while pressing the keys. To withdraw your question, please press star then 2. Please limit questions to one primary question and one follow-up. If you have further questions, you may re-enter the question queue. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble our roster. and today's first question comes from Neil Mehta at Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Good morning, Richard. It's the Neil team. Thanks for taking the time. You know, I guess the first question is the $6 billion debt target. How did you come up with that number? Why is that the right number? And when you look at the forward curve, when do you think you can hit that number? You know, we were thinking maybe it's end of 2027. And at that point, should we assume that you're in a position to be returning capital by 2028.

Great. Thanks, Sunil. I'm going to start and then let Sunil go into some of the details on the play out of our priorities. I guess first, just in context of the $6 billion first to say, very pleased with the progress of our plan. We've been able to continue to accelerate really most components. I think one thing I'd like to say as we get into the priorities and where it fits, we want to remain very focused, clear, and consistent. and I think that has really been a part of the plan that we put together. Part of that is the ability to accelerate in terms of our cash flow priorities and accelerate return of capital. I think the $6 billion is building capacity really at any price. So we think about building capacity for the dividend at lower prices like 50, but at mid-cycle, As we're talking about, we're able to accelerate a broader return of capital plan. I think the priorities for us stay the same. Internally, continue to improve the balance sheet, continue to improve resources, continue to improve cost efficiency, and then follow our disciplined cash flow priorities. So I think that $6 billion is an important step in terms of principal debt that demonstrates or really provides that capacity and clarity as we go into the steps of our cash flow priorities. But let Sunil walk through that and help on how we got there.

Hi, Neil. You know, we made significant progress on strengthening our balance sheet. And the principal debt milestones that we set were based on achieving certain leverage metric. It was primarily debt to EBITDA. So at principal debt of $10 billion, the debt to EBITDA was approximately $1 at 60 WTI. and at principal debt of six billion, the debt to EBITDA is around one at 50 WTI, which is what we would like to maintain in the long term. Also at six billion principal debt, based on our debt to EBITDA metric and normalized for prices, our balance sheet will be the strongest that we have been in a decade. Once we achieved our six billion principal debt milestone, we will balance additional principal debt reduction and building cash based on the macro and timing related to the preferred redemption in August 2029. And with respect to your question on 2027, as we look at 2027 at mid-cycle or even current strict prices, we will have opportunity to make meaningful progress towards our new $6 billion principal debt milestone, which expands our financial capacity for the preferred redemption and accelerate our broader return of capital opportunities. So once we get there, we plan to evaluate opportunistic share repurchases and especially once we get to a net cash position. So we don't want to say when in 27 we would get there, but, you know, you can assume that we would definitely get there and potentially a net cash position in 2027. And I would say in terms of dividend growth, as we look at, you know, Total Cash Flow Priorities. In terms of dividend growth, we will be measured, ensuring that we can support it through the cycle through a combination of strong balance sheet and increasing sustainable cash flow. So the progress on both of these will determine how we think about dividend growth and accordingly recommend to our board.

Thank you, Sunil. And Richard and Tim, just your thoughts on the trajectory of GOA production You produced 110 in the quarter because of some outages. You kind of guided to plus minus 115 in Q4 for BOED. We were thinking next year maybe 125, but just your perspective on what 27 looks like, recognizing it's a transition year as you guys are working through the water floods.

Yeah, no, appreciate it. I'll start and then Ken can provide more detail. I think, yeah, I mean, the one key point you mentioned, I just want to reiterate, I would say, you know, we're moving into the capacity to make investments in things like the water floods, which are meaningful. We've had success exploration, we continue development, but an important investment capability that we now have as we've improved the balance sheet is these mid-cycle GOA water floods. And so part of that is Spending the bulk of our capital, especially going into next year around that project, it has a bit of a delay in terms of production, but we think it's really important as we think about this sustainable cash flow perspective that we're putting together. But let me turn it over to Ken to walk through some of the moving parts.

Good afternoon. Looking ahead to 27, we're currently optimizing the drilling schedule versus the available rig time. And as you said, we're shifting capital to front-end load the water injection wells. We're sequencing the others to match the prioritized inventory as well as looking at can we defer exploration and go into the following year in order to yield more development wells. Torn mountain water injection wells will take four months to drill and complete and cost around $100 million each. So that gives you an idea of what the front end of the year looks like. I think we have some opportunities, but overall I wouldn't disagree with your assessments.

Thank you. Our next question today comes from Doug Liggett with Wolf Research. Please go ahead.

Thanks very much. Thanks, Richard and team. I appreciate you having me on. Richard, I guess these are kind of addendums to Neil's questions, but my first one is on the $4 billion question. Pre-Cash Flow Improvement. I want to try and articulate this correctly. A decent part of that is the reduction in the decline curve, the 25 to the 20%. What I'm trying to figure out is once you achieve that towards the end of the decade, does that reduced sustaining capital translate to a lower absolute spending number or do you keep the capex at a level for, for example, a pivot back to growth? That's kind of my first question. My second question is on what you just said about the dividend. Because we know you have a penalty on redeeming the prefs early. You also have a penalty on the threshold for buybacks. What you don't have a penalty on is your dividend. And I'm thinking back to the Steve Chazen school of dividend aristocracy. You've got the portfolio ready. Thank you very much. I hope that makes some kind of sense, but those are my two questions. Thank you.

No, that's great, Doug. Yeah, I'll start with the $4 billion and kind of the pieces on sustaining capital. I think we really like the sustainable cash flow, the way we put this together. And let me just break it down on a few moving parts. In terms of cash from operations, you know continuing to drive obviously expenses but also higher margin production and some of that's even oilier production as we look at things like GOA or Powder River Basin or even our EOR and so both of those you know are improving even with flat capital and in flat production so that that's one component The other component is sustaining capital, as you mentioned, and two parts to that. One is capital efficiency. So this new well and facility cost improvement that we continue to drive, we're able to deliver more with less. We're actually dropping three rigs at the end of this year, adding 15 more wells online. We've just continued to be able to drive that more productivity per dollar spent. And then the last piece, as you said, and have helped us highlight, is really this decline rate. And so, you know, the decline rate comes from projects like global water floods that we've been able to point out, but also these opportunities in EOR that really came about this year. So as we look kind of to your last part of that question is really growth. and so the way we think about growth is one we can improve the sustainable cash flow cash from operations minus sustaining capital really without growth so make that point too you know growth for us will be we call it measured and efficiency led you know the returns are obviously important we need to maintain cost efficiency and then the free cash flow timing as we put all these pieces together is really important. So if growth is a part, one, it is likely efficiency led and if there's more capital that goes there, it would be very measured. All the time making our sustaining cash flow better. So say that, let me jump to the dividend and buyback and then Sunil, if you've got anything you can add to that. I think, again, back to, you know, Key points are our cash flow priorities. One, the stronger balance sheet, and as we just have improved our financial strength, it really provides opportunity for all of the above. Operational efficiency through the cycle, but a broader return on capital. You're right. Dividend for us is really how we think about the fundamental starting point for return of capital in the business. And it's back to what is your cash from operations and your sustaining capital at 50. and so that today with progress like our debt interest provides quite a bit of room for that. Buybacks, you know, as we reach a net cash position that becomes a part of our opportunity as well as we see dislocation, as we see in our share price, if we see the right macro condition Longer term, we would like that to be sizable and more counter-cyclical, which is back to why we need such a strong balance sheet to accomplish that. So let me just make sure Sunil gets any final points there too.

Hi, Doug. Like I mentioned in my prepared remarks, at $6 billion principal debt, our interest expense savings alone will be approximately $1 billion lower than 2025. And if you look at our current annual dividend payout run rate, it is around $1.1 billion. So our current annualized common dividend run rate compared to say the fourth quarter of last year is higher by around $175 million, and that is primarily related to the two dividend increases we announced this year. So adjusting for that dividend increase, interest savings alone will be around $825 million lower than 2025, which provides the opportunity for a sustainable and growing dividend. and we have also, like Richard just walked through, we have also highlighted the operational efficiency improvements in our $4 billion cash flow plan, which is again going to further support a sustainable and growing dividend. So, like you correctly summarized, we do have the depth and quality in our portfolio. We are building a very strong balance sheet. We have outlined a $4 billion annual sustainable cash flow improvement plan, which all leads to a sustainable and growing dividend. So we're just being measured and disciplined, but that is something we are thinking through. And at the right time, we will be announcing all the changes in the dividend. And the last thing I would say is, like Richard highlighted, a stronger balance sheet also provides the opportunity to do buybacks through the commodity cycles, which will be our preference after the redemption of the preferred. And until then, we'll just be opportunistic in terms of share repurchase.

Thank you. Our next question today comes from Betty Jang with Barclays. Please go ahead.

Hi, thank you for taking my question. And I want to go to the Delaware CO2 offtake contract. Seems like that's opening a new chapter for your EOR business. So just want to understand how you're thinking about incorporating those volumes into your EOR portfolio. once they come online. Are you more thinking about that as a lower cost replacement for the CO2 that you're already buying? Or does that let you to do more EOR and expand the opportunities potentially in the unconventional space? And longer term, like just given the size of the gas processing footprint in the Permian, how big could that CO2 supply become? And does that materially change the

Thank you very much. Yeah, we're excited about this step here. I think just to frame a few of those points, today these deals we're talking about are 2 million tons a year. Thank you for joining us. The developers, obviously the gas processor, and then our ability to pay for the offtake. And so about 30% of the cost of an EOR barrel is power and CO2. So when you're talking to move 15% or possibly even higher, that's a pretty meaningful step change in sort of the total spend per barrel as we look at these EOR opportunities. The size of the prize, you know, our team has kind of put together a look and estimate about 50 million tons per year of CO2 from sources like this. The two most meaningful are gas processing. And the other I would highlight that we remain optimistic about is natural gas power generation. So we see about 10 million tons a year of gas processing and over 15 million tons of your natural gas power generation. Obviously, there's been a lot of talk about that in the Permian. Five, just for reference, five gigawatts of power generation basically replaces our CO2 purchases today. And so again, a pretty meaningful. I would say in terms of where we go with the volumes, You know, I think optionality is the word I would tell you. I think, you know, being in the Delaware Basin, obviously, great proximity to our unconventional opportunities. But because of our CO2 infrastructure that we have, it's also near pipelines and ability to get it to our central basin platform. So we're very excited about this. The developers that we're partnering with, we're happy with that. They're able to fund us. and build these. And so it really is a type of partnership, capital-wide approach that we really have intended for our CO2 sourcing. So appreciate the opportunity to talk through all that.

Thank you for the color. That seems like a big opportunity long-term. And then for my follow-up, if I can go back to just 2027 and hoping to get more color on the oil trajectory into next year. There's been quite a bit of noise in the back half of the year because of the GOA outages and in the early part of the year you had the EOR divestiture and there's also activity shift between the PRB and the DJ and the Rockies. So can you just help us think through like the oil trajectory into next year and just high level like should we expect oil volumes to grow on the average on a year-to-year basis?

Hi Betty, this is Sunil here. So like I mentioned again in my prepared remarks, with the $5.9 billion, we expect relatively flat production on a BOE basis. But on an oil basis, at a high level, we expect production to be flat to slight increase. And if you look at some of the contribution from the different business units, Permian production is expected to grow modestly, both on a BOE and oil basis. So it is basically building on the results and learnings from our 2026 program. And we are high grading our 27th plan towards higher return opportunities and positioning us for modest production growth with strong capital efficiency. So like Richard said earlier, it is about doing more with less. In terms of Rocky's production, we expect it to be flat on a BOE basis. but we expect growth in the oilier powder basin offsetting the decline in TJ. We already talked about Gulf of America. The teams are still optimizing the drilling program between development and exploration. And like Ken mentioned, the two injectors are going to be front-end loaded in our drilling program. So there could be some reduction in the Gulf of America production due to the timing of these injectors. Thank you. Our next question today comes from Nitin Kumar with Mizuho. Please go ahead.

Hi, good afternoon, Richard and Sunil. Thanks for the update on the advanced recovery. I'm going to actually go back to primary recovery for a minute. One of your peers has talked about the Barnett formation, and you highlight well costs that are quite a bit below what they're seeing today. Just curious, what do you see as the opportunity in the Barnett, and how does that fit into your overall development program?

Yeah, thanks for the question. We've been really pleased with the Barnett progress. As you know, we started several years ago, really as part of our Echo Patrol JV. We were able to learn and appraise and advance that opportunity. So we've had several years at it, which I think has helped us. I think we've got still about 30% of all the online wells or wells that have been drilled in the Barnett have been oxys. I would say, you know, a few pieces how we look at it, starting with the drilling costs, where you went. I think we've been able to achieve more 10,000-foot laterals, and that's really helped bring our drilling costs down. We've been really less than $750 a foot for drilling completion and equipped. We like to include that hookup component as well in our numbers, which has been very good and certainly quite a bit of improvement since 2025. But as importantly as the well performance are even more important, and I think when we look at our six-month oil per foot, we've been over 12.5 there, which has been quite a bit better than industry. I think we've got more than 10 of the top 15 wells on that metric. So that well performance we've been very focused on. I would say the one thing we did this year is be able to do a bit more appraisal. So we've gone on sort of delineate some of the areas for us that means, you know, really on the eastern side of our position. And so we've been able to learn that. We'll be coming back into the core for the remaining wells this year and into next year. So we expect these you know these top performance to continue to improve but overall very pleased with that. It's a big part of the Midland Basin and you know excited about our Barnett opportunities.

Great thanks for the call Richard and I want to maybe touch on Stratos. We haven't talked about it yet but you mentioned in the slides that there was a little bit of an incremental cost for some repairs but you expect that project to be starting up at the end of the year. You know, given how the market for carbon credits has shifted, just if you could maybe give us a reminder of, you know, what is the, I know the CapEx rolls off next year, but what is the EBITDA opportunity, or do you see that as sort of a common to this new CO2 offtake that you just signed?

Good afternoon, it's Ken here.

As you said, we have had cost increases during the life of the project. Around 60% came from technology and operational improvements and phasing. The remainder is made up mainly of inflation, productivity and QAQC during the life of the project. Spend next year will be minimal. In terms of the impact on the levelized cost of capture, it's about 10%. because of the leverage difference between CAPEX and OPEX on the project. We can see potential ways to offset some of those OPEX elements following startup and we have some operational milestones to track those.

Yeah, and I'll just add as we think about economics and maybe the market and even how it compares to these CO2 supply, agreements we just had with the gas processing. I think, you know, start where Ken did. I think two key drivers, one starting clearly OPEX. And so as we look at, you know, the opportunity for OPEX, we feel like that's with, you know, far in our capability to think about Thank you for joining us. remains the same. Obviously, that OPEX will help improve that. So next year will be a ramp up. And then we pointed to Project EBITDA in 2028 of $90 to $130 million. So we remain on track for that. And the third part, you know, is how to further improve that would be the market. And I think Unique for direct air capture is really that market component where your atmospheric CO2 is at a premium. And so we think about access to things like sustainable aviation fuel markets. Thank you for joining us. What we can control is bring the cost down, and we still see tremendous improvement. And as we get this operational, we hope to point to more where we can drive significantly the cost of this down to get to really the CO2 price drop. that can fit into EOR as we gain more access into those premium markets. So hopefully that helps tie the pieces together. But the first step is coming online and really delivering against the customer base that we have today to deliver that EBITDA.

Thank you. Our next question today comes from James West at Milius Research. Please go ahead.

Hey, guys. Wanted to touch on the dividend again and just curious if you have some type of framework in place. I know you don't want to get ahead of your skis. You don't want to grow it too fast. You want it to be durable. But is there some way we can think about what to expect as you transition into the dividend growth story?

Yeah, I appreciate the question to walk through that because that is – a really important foundation for how we're trying to build the business. So we think about this sustainable cash flow at 50. And so we look at our cash from operations, we look at our sustaining capital at 50, and we believe that cash flow is what we point to for dividend capability. I would say in the near term, we've been working on balance sheet, which we feel like, you know, again, longer term does things for operational continuity and broader return of capital things like share repurchases. But ultimately, we will always point to that $50 sustainable cash flow for how we think about a dividend. And, you know, for us in the business and especially in operations, These are very clear drivers for our operational teams to capital efficiency, base decline, lower LOE, and all of those as we mark progress will be direct correlation to what we can do with the dividend. And obviously, debt interest is a big part of it this year.

Okay, I think that's fairly clear. Richard, thank you for that. And then maybe just a quick follow-up. You mentioned you've got AI on, I think, 68% or so of the wells watching the recoveries. And I'm curious if you could give a little more detail there on, are you running some autonomous operations? Is it acting as just a data... Context for your engineers. How are you using that AI?

Yeah, excited about that. It's moved quick for us in a good way, especially around our production operations. So a couple of pieces beyond what I was able to say in the prepared remarks. So you're right, 9,000 wells are under AI control. surveillance today. It does two things. One helps engineers, you know, the AI can work at night. And so it helps accelerate really the engineers access to what could be the dysfunctions, whether that's downhole or even on surface with things like compression to optimize. The subset of that that's autonomous is about 50%. So meaningfully, We have quite a bit of production, especially in the Delaware Basin that operates autonomously, I think about 450,000 barrels a day. What that's doing is as we, again, see dysfunctions or opportunities in things like our gas lift system, you're able to reroute or optimize gas downhole across a larger network. So these are quite a few wells that are tied into an individual network that you're able to optimize. Longer term, I think we're drilling completion, square in scope. I think we'll continue to drive up both the surveillance and the autonomous nature of our system. And then maybe on the front end is seismic. in the Gulf of America. I think this may be interesting or unique to Oxy. We're not only using wells to improve our seismic, say, subsalt seismic. We've been able to use over 3,000 wells to help better generally characterize the subsurface, and that can help on things like water floods. So, really optimizing placement and management of the water flood. So, lots of opportunity with AI. you know Ken's been pretty focused on that as well so I'll make sure if he has anything else to add.

Just building on what Richard said on the subsurface side you know in the man for example we inject 600,000 barrels a day of steam all of that is now optimized injection in every well every location by every pattern so we see significant benefits there in terms of operations the teams here have done an amazing job of reducing failure frequency on every type of artificial lift. We're now at our lowest failure rates in our history. And then the last thing is maintenance analysis. If you look at GOA, we've got 155 large rotating equipment elements offshore. 55% of our unplanned failures relate to seawater lift pumps. That analysis was done in about an hour. So if we fix one bearing, we then reduce our unplanned Thank you.

And our next question today comes from Arun Jayaram with JPMorgan Charities. Please go ahead.

Yeah, good afternoon. I wanted to get your thoughts on how you're thinking about the exploration portfolio We noted that you guys have contracted a rig to do some work in Peru, maybe a couple of wells. I'd love to hear broadly how you're thinking about exploration as we think about 2027.

Yeah, if you look at the offshore exploration you mentioned, with our partnerships, we have three modest investment exploration opportunities included in our capital plans. These provide exposure to mean Net, UNRIS target volumes of greater than 2 billion BOE, which is successful would be in the post 2030 development timeframe with partners, which we could adjust then. That includes Trinidad and Tobago with Exxon, the Trujillo Basin, which is trending in Peru, as you mentioned, and then Komodo in Colombia, where we've made some permitting progress recently and where we've operated before.

Maybe I'll just add one piece on that. I think that Teams has done a great job between exploration to development, not just thinking about the finding cost and sort of the timing. I think we've been smart thinking longer term about finding and development costs, making sure it all fits our sustainable cash flow plan. And then as we think about 2030, making sure it all fits to improve. But we've got a great pipeline. Teams has done a great job, so it'll be exciting as we're able to pursue those in our future.

Great, thank you for that. I just had one follow-up on the cash flow statement maybe for Sunil. Sunil, in the discontinued ops line, you've had some outflows, I think related to OxyChem and taxes. Can you just elaborate on that? It was about $450 million in the quarter and about $1.4 billion year-to-date.

Hi Arun, so with respect to the Q3 455 million, around 415 million is related to tax and the balance 40 or 45 million is related to environmental and transaction costs. And on a year-to-date basis of the 1.4 billion, around 1.2 billion is related to tax and the remaining is a combination again of environmental and transaction costs.

Thank you. And this concludes our question and answer session. I'd like to turn the conference back over to Richard Jackson for any closing remarks.

Okay, thank you again everyone. We really appreciate the questions and your time today. Please have a good day.

Thank you. The conference has now concluded and we thank you all for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect your lines and have a wonderful day.