Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you for standing by. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to Stellis Capital Investment Corporation's conference call to report financial results for its third fiscal quarter ended September 30th, 2026. At this time, all participants are in the listen-only mode. We will open the floor for your questions after the presentation. If you wish to join the queue to ask a question at any time, please press star followed by one. to remove yourself from the queue, please press star followed by two. This conference is being recorded today, November 10th, 2026. It is now my pleasure to turn the call over to Mr. Robert Ladd, Chief Executive Officer of Stellis Capital Investment Corporation. Mr. Ladd, you may begin your conference.

Okay, thank you, Sylvie. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining the call. Welcome to our conference call covering the quarter-ended September 30th, 2026. We have six topics to cover this morning. First, our financial results for the third quarter. Second, portfolio and asset quality. Third, a history of our Stellis investing and life-to-date performance. Fourth, an outlook for Q4 and beyond. Fifth, our $20 million share-buy-back program. And sixth, our opportunities for growth. Joining me as usual this morning is Todd Huskinson, our Chief Financial Officer, who will cover important information about the forward-looking state.

Thank you, Rob. I'd like to remind everyone that today's call is being recorded. Please note that this call is the property of Stellis Capital Investment Corporation and that any unauthorized broadcast of this call in any form is strictly prohibited. Audio replay of the call will be available by using the telephone number and pen provided in our press release announcing this call. I'd also like to call your attention to the customary safe harbor disclosure in our press release regarding forward-looking information. Today's conference call may also include forward-looking statements and projections, and we ask that you refer to our most recent filing with the SEC for important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these projections. We will not update any forward-looking statements unless required by law. To obtain copies of our latest SEC filings, please visit our website at www.stalliscapital.com under the Public Investors link, or call us at 713-292-5400. I'll start by covering our operating results for the quarter. In the third quarter, we generated 25 cents per share of GAAP net investment income and core net investment income of 26 cents per share, which excludes estimated excise taxes. Overall for the quarter, net asset value decreased by 40 cents per share, or 3%, driven by two primary factors. First, net realized and unrealized losses contributed 48 cents per share, primarily driven by write-downs related to company-specific performance. Second, our share repurchase program was accretive to NAV, adding approximately 8 cents per share. Turning to portfolio activity and composition, we ended the quarter with an investment portfolio at fair value of $966 million across 119 portfolio companies. a slight decrease from $968 million across 116 portfolio companies as of June 30th, 2026. During the third quarter we invested a total of $37.8 million of which $29.7 million was in four new portfolio companies and $1.4 million was add-ons to existing portfolio companies. We also received three full repayments totaling $18.8 million and received $111.5 million of other repayments at par. The average loan per company is $8.8 million and the largest overall investment is $24.3 million, both at fair value. For the 99 companies that comprise our loan portfolio, the weighted average EBITDA level was $15.9 million at quarter end and the weighted average normalized leverage was 4.2 times for the performing loans in the portfolio. As a reminder, SCIC co-invests alongside the other Stellis investment vehicles, so SCIC's exposure is only a portion of the total exposure. While we invest in lower middle market companies, these are still substantial businesses with meaningful earnings and private equity capital on their balance sheets. As an example, in general, our portfolio companies have an enterprise value in excess of $100 million with loan-to-value ratios of less than 50%. At September 30th, 100% of our loans were secured, 93% were priced at floating rates and substantially all of our portfolio companies are backed by a private equity firm. From an asset quality perspective, our weighted average risk grade is slightly below plan. At fair value, 78% of our portfolio is rated a one or two or on or ahead of plan and 22% of the portfolio is marked at an investment category of three or below, meaning not meeting plan or expectations. We added one loan to non-accrual status during the quarter. Currently, we have loans to six portfolio companies on non-accrual, which comprise 9.6% of the total cost and 5.4% of the fair value of the total investment portfolio, respectively, which represents a slight increase from the prior quarter at cost and no change in fair value. To be clear, the level of non-accruals remains higher than historical averages, and reducing both the number of these investments Robert Ladd, William Todd Huskinson, William Todd Huskinson, our share repurchase program and opportunities for growth. Thank you, Todd.

For the benefit of our new and prospective shareholders who are listening, and as a reminder for our long-time shareholders, I thought I would share some background about our history and life-to-date results. First, we are one of the longest-tenured active private credit managers with a history of investing that is 22 years across 400 companies and $10 billion of deployment. The Stellis management team has an investing history that has been resilient across multiple macroeconomic cycles, including the global financial crisis of 2008-2009, COVID-19, the global pandemic, and periods of other market volatility, such as the international tariff disruption of 2025. Second, we're the lead lender in approximately 65% of our loan investments, and all of our loans have financial covenants. Effectively, all of our portfolio companies are backed by a private equity sponsor and have substantial equity below us at the time the loans are made, typically at least 50%. I'd also like to point out this is different than the broadly syndicated loan market in which many of the larger public and private BDCs invest where there are light to no covenants, leverage levels are typically higher, and the lenders may be participating alone with no ability to control outcomes. And third, we have a long history of equity co-investments alongside our debt investments. This is where we buy a small piece of equity in the companies we lend money to, usually 5% of the total portfolio at cost. The equity co-investments have resulted in substantial equity gains. For SEIC, this has generated $98 million of realized gains live to date, which has largely offset loan losses, thereby protecting the net asset value of our shareholders. Regarding SEIC, since our IPO in November of 2012, we have invested approximately $2.9 billion in more than 230 portfolio companies while navigating multiple market and credit cycles, as I mentioned before. Over this time, we have received approximately $1.9 billion of repayments while maintaining disciplined credit. Over our 14-year track record, we have generated a life-to-date return on equity for investors of 9.2%. which includes all realized and unrealized gains and losses across the portfolio. We've also paid 356 million of dividends to our investors since our IPO, representing $19.08 per share over this period. Now turning to Outlook. As of today, our portfolio is approximately 951 million across 120 portfolio companies. For the balance of the quarter, we expect new fundings, which will likely replace repayments, Robert Ladd, William Todd Huskinson Robert Ladd, William Todd Huskinson We expect to be well positioned to earn our 25 cent quarterly dividend moving forward. Now turning to the share repurchase program, which you've heard about before, where we approved in the spring a $20 million program for repurchasing. We think this is certainly an attractive use of capital today. And so to date in 2026, we have repurchased the 767,880 shares for a total cost of $6.6 million. Going forward, we'll continue to analyze liquidity and leverage levels as we consider additional repurchases. And finally, opportunities for growth from here. As we mentioned last quarter, we've begun investing in our third SBIC license and have grown the portfolio to $23 million. Near term, we expect to fund three additional deals which will increase the portfolio by approximately $25 million. that should come by year end. This third license allows us to contribute up to $125 million of equity and access up to $250 million of long-term low-cost SBA guaranteed debentures. In addition, the SBA recently increased the maximum amount of debentures that a family of funds may have outstanding from $350 million to $475 million. providing us with additional long-term financing capacity as we continue to grow the platform. We believe these developments and changes will ultimately result in the ability to expand the investment portfolio by up to 100 million over time, or approximately 10% of the current portfolio today at fair value. And with that, Sylvie, let's open for questions and answers.

Thank you, sir. Ladies and gentlemen, the floor is now open for questions. If you wish to join the queue to ask a question at this time, please press star 1. We do ask if listening on speakerphone today to please pick up your handset while asking your question to provide optimal sound quality. Once again, please press star 1 on your phone at this time to join the queue to ask a question. Thank you. And your first question will be from Eric Zwick at Lucid Capital. Please go ahead.

Good morning, Eric. Good morning, guys. Good morning. I wanted to start, I guess, with just a bit of a follow-up on the commentary about share repurchases and also mention that the pipeline still looks attractive today. So just given the discount of where the stock is trading in the market today relative to NAV, it's pretty compelling from a math standpoint to repurchase shares. So how do you guys think about that? Where to allocate those funds? between share repurchases and new potential loans or add-on opportunities?

Yeah, Eric, so very good question. So as I indicated earlier, we purchased about 6.6 million of shares so far against the $20 million authority from the board. I think at this point, there's no question it's an attractive investment for the company to make, meaning repurchasing shares at such a discount. I think we just want to balance overall liquidity and leverage levels in doing so. So more to come on that, but that's the balancing that we're doing. I think you'll find us continue to invest in new opportunities on the balance sheet, but we'll be certainly looking to share repurchases as they make sense.

Great. I appreciate the color there. And then just looking at the fair value of the equity portfolio, I guess up to just under maybe 10% of the fair value of the total portfolio today. You've historically had the opportunity to realize some gains. Is there any outlook, a near-term outlook? I know it's hard to have a view out past maybe three to six months, but any near-term opportunities where you expect you might realize some gains there from the equity portfolio?

Yes, one of the repayments that we may receive over the next two to three months would include a nice equity gain. Beyond that, no near-term visibility, but we're certainly optimistic in 27 that we'll see more. And that portfolio has a nice markup, but it's relatively modest based on our experience, which has been about three times our investment. Robert Ladd, William Todd Huskinson, Robert Ladd, William Todd Huskinson, Recycling of Capital When They Occur.

And then last question for me. I think in talking about the unrealized depreciation, the quarter mentioned company-specific performance. And just curious if you could give us a little color there in terms of what you saw at that company or companies that drove that mark and if it's multiple, is it any kind of common trends that you're noticing?

Yeah, Eric, it's Todd. So I would say that, you know, there were several names. Most of them were on our non-accrual list as we continue to work those positions and, you know, over time just kind of dealing with the current facts and circumstances that are occurring there. So those were further write downs on four of those names. are five of those names. And then we also had another position that was a three that was realized after quarter end, but we wrote it down by four and a half million. And you'll see that at the beginning of the quarter, it's in the subsequent events for that company was, we were paid off and recognized a loss in Q4, but it was an unrealized loss in Q3. So that's a position that won't be there next quarter.

I might just add on that last position. This was a company that was being marketed for sale by the sponsor and turned out there were not attractive offers that came in and ultimately sold to another party at a discount. And that, as Todd said, realized in October but written down to that level at 930.

That's very helpful. Thank you.

Yeah, thank you, Eric.

The next question comes from Christopher Nolan at Leidenberg Thalmann. Please go ahead, Christopher.

Hey, guys. Rob, on your comments, and I apologize for missing this, you said expand portfolio by $100 million over time. Am I correct that's mostly from SBA investing or did I miss something?

No, Chris, that's right. That's expressing the potential that is there. by now in another way of recycling capital more to SBIC3 because of the two-to-one leverage and lower cost of borrowing. But that would be the mechanism to get up as much as 10% of size from here.

Got it. And then J.R. Watkins, as I recall, is mostly in the SBIC. Does that affect the recovery at all? I mean, is that government guaranteed or anything like that?

No. If something's in the SBIC, it would just be that it had certain financial attributes that qualified for it to be there, but otherwise doesn't affect the company, how it's managed or recovery.

Understood. And then I guess, you know, given where the stock price is right now and your current dividend is over 20%, which is Robert Ladd

You know, it's an outstanding opportunity. I think we just want to balance maintaining our equity base and our leverage level. And so I think we're just going to be looking at it over time, but would expect that it's very attractive and we would continue to execute on that program.

Okay, thank you.

Yeah, thank you, Chris.

Next question will be from Robert Dodd at Raymond James. Please go ahead, Robert.

Hi, guys. I just want to get a handle. Obviously, there are some underperforming assets, and as you point out, you've got a good track record of turning those around. But that requires fundamentally that the end market still be good, and it's a stumble by the borrower. So how much of that depreciation that's currently in the portfolio that you think is actually ultimately recoverable. I mean, as you said, you just had an asset sell after the end of the quarter for a loss. So they don't always come back, but sometimes they do. I'm just trying to get a handle on how much you think is recoverable, how much of it is a work in progress, because obviously you mark it down during the process. But just trying to get a picture there on what you think Robert Ladd, William Todd Huskinson, Robert Ladd, William Todd Huskinson, Robert Ladd, William Todd Huskinson, Robert Ladd, William Todd Huskinson,

that that's one that I think would be more likely to see appreciation. But we feel like the debt portfolio and those are probably marked, you know, for the information we have today. Got it. Got it. Thank you.

And then one more. On the NAV, I mean, it's been particularly, you know, relatively volatile over the last year. I mean, a year ago, roughly, Robert Ladd, William Todd Huskinson in the, you know, broadly across the portfolio, which are obviously, if that happened, you might see more stability in NAV and investors would have a little bit more maybe relaxed approach to the NAV if it wasn't bouncing around quite as much quarter to quarter.

Yeah, yeah, another good question. So in a relative sense, if it's helpful, it's a 3% movement. So it's, I know it may seem large, but that's a small movement I think we call and value things as we see the information each quarter and as an example in the second quarter we had some movement up on positions, they came down so I think we're just trying to be as precise as we can in the valuation process but I couldn't predict a time when it would be not move at all and in the meantime we're generating a Thank you everyone for being on the call, for being supportive and We sure look forward to speaking with you in the new year about the performance for the fourth quarter. Happy holidays to everyone.

Thank you, sir. This does conclude today's conference call. You may disconnect your phone lines at this time and have a wonderful day. Thank you for your participation.