Thank you for standing by. My name is Jordan and I'll be your conference operator today. At this time, I'd like to welcome everyone to the Univest Financial Corporation third quarter 2026 earnings call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. There will be a question and answer session at the end of today's meeting. If you'd like to ask a question, simply press star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, press star one again. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. I would now like to turn the conference over to Jeff Schweitzer, Chairman, President, and CEO. You may begin.

Thank you, Jordan, and good morning and thank you to all of our listeners for joining us. Joining me on the call this morning is Mike Keim, our Chief Operating Officer and President of Univest Bank and Trust, and Brian Richardson, our Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone of the forward-looking statements disclaimer. Please be advised that during the course of this conference call, management may make forward-looking statements that express management's intentions, beliefs, or expectations within the meaning of the federal securities laws. UNIVEST's actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by these forward-looking statements. I will refer you to the forward-looking cautionary statements in our earnings release and in our SEC filings. Hopefully everyone had a chance to review our earnings release from yesterday. If not, it can be found on our website at univest.net under the Investor Relations tab. We reported net income of $21.6 million or 78 cents per share for the third quarter. Our results for the quarter were negatively impacted by a $14.4 million charge-off associated with a commercial lending relationship, which had a specific reserve of $9.8 million at June 30th. The remaining balance related to this credit is supported by a letter of intent to sell the business. While the results for the quarter were impacted by this credit event, excluding this charge-off, our core operations and pipelines remain solid and our asset quality remains stable to improving, with our criticized classified loans expected to decline in the fourth quarter. While lending activity continues to be solid, loans declined just slightly during the quarter, primarily due to the planned payoff of a $35.3 million shared national credit and the previously noted charge-off. Total deposits for the quarter increased $421.5 million, or 6.1%, primarily due to the seasonal increase in public funds deposits, along with growth in commercial deposits. We continue to execute on our initiative to lower our loan-to-deposit ratio, which on average was 120 basis points lower year-to-date than through the first nine months of 2025. Our fee businesses and fee income continue to contribute to our overall operations. Excluding bully death benefits, fee income increased 6.3% compared to the third quarter of 2025, led by wealth management, which increased 10.3%. We continue to be active with respect to stock buybacks, buying back 301,127 shares of our stock during the quarter. Year to date, we have repurchased 1,077,804 shares, or 3.8% of outstanding shares as of the beginning of the year. Before I pass it over to Brian, I would like to thank the entire Univest family for the great work they do every day and for their continued efforts serving our customers, communities, and each other. I will now turn it over to Brian for further discussion on our results.

Thank you, Jeff, and thank you to everybody for joining us today. I would like to start by touching on four items from the earnings release. First, we saw continued strength in net interest income and expansion of our core net interest margin during the quarter. Net interest income increased 1.5 million, or 2.3%, compared to the second quarter, and increased 6.4 million, or 10.5%, compared to the third quarter of 2025. reported net interest margin was 3.42% compared to 3.49% in the second quarter. However, the decrease was driven by higher excess liquidity during the quarter from our seasonal public funds bill. Excluding the impact of excess liquidity, our core net interest margin increased two basis points to 3.55% from 3.53% in the second quarter.

Second, as it relates to credit, as Jeff mentioned,

14.4 million of the 17.6 million dollars in net charge-offs for the quarter was associated with one commercial relationship we discussed last quarter. As a result of the elevated charge-off activity, our provision for credit losses was 9 million dollars during the quarter. During the quarter, non-performing assets declined to 51.4 million from 63 million at June 30th. Our allowance for credit losses was $81 million, or 1.15% of total loans held for investment, compared to 1.28% at June 30th. Third, as Jeff mentioned, our core fee businesses continue to perform well during the quarter. As we've said in the past, our diversified fee income businesses continue to serve us well while providing earning stability in varying economic environments. Fourth, non-interest expense was $54 million for the quarter, an increase of $3.3 million, or 6.6%, compared to the third quarter of 2025. This was driven by higher compensation, marketing, and data processing costs. With regards to compensation costs, in addition to annual merit increases, increased variable compensation, and increased medical costs, we've seen increases in staff, primarily within revenue-producing areas and our data analytics functions. With regards to marketing, we entered into a sponsorship agreement with a local university and have also seen increased advertising spend related to various deposit origination initiatives. Despite the year-over-year expense increase, our efficiency ratio improved to 59.5% for the quarter compared to 62.3% in the second quarter and 60.2% in the third quarter of last year. I would now like to turn briefly to our outlook for the remainder of 2026. We are maintaining our outlook for loan growth of approximately 2-3% for the full year. We are updating our full-year net interest income growth outlook to a range of 10-11%. With respect to provision expense, we expect a full-year provision of $15-17 million. However, as I've said in the past, provisioning is event-driven and may be impacted by the resolution of workout credits, loan growth, and changes in economic conditions. With regards to non-interest income, we expect growth of 5% to 7%, excluding bully death benefits and REO valuation adjustments. As it relates to non-interest expense, we expect growth of 5% to 6% for the full year when excluding restructuring charges. That concludes my prepared remarks.

Jordan, we would be happy to take any questions at this time.

As a reminder, if you'd like to ask a question during this time, simply press star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. We'll just take a brief moment to compile the Q&A roster. Your first question comes from the line of Tim Switzer from KBW. Your line is live.

Hey, good morning, guys.

Thanks for taking my question.

Morning, Tim. My first one is on... The rate outlook with the NIM, we've already had one Fed rate hike, could maybe have a few more, hopefully more gradual than last hike cycle. What are you guys' thoughts on kind of the impact on the margin, assuming we get a few more? I know you guys talked about being a little, you know, neutral and maybe slightly asset sensitive. Does that change over the course of the cycle if we get several rate hikes and how should we think about that?

This is Brian. I'll start out on that one. Really, as we've said in the past, we are neutral. We don't expect to call it the first hundred basis points or so in an upward rate environment to be overly impactful to our NIM. We do expect small opportunity, a couple of basis points of potential expansion. Say, if you look from Q4, where we're projecting We expect the core NIM to increase slightly from Q3 into Q4. And then if you use that as a launching point going into 27, you might have a couple of basis points of expansion based on the current rate outlook. of course there is churn that we would expect and benefits from repricing on the loan side however competition in the competitive environment could weigh on that potential upside opportunity and of course on the liability side competition for deposits remains fierce so that that's the other item that is at play so I think there's slight opportunity but call it relatively flat this slightly up would be the expectation for NIM right okay that's good to hear um

What are the early indications of customer demand for higher deposit rates with the Fed moving? What does competition in your markets look like across your different geographies?

Tim, it's Mike. Good morning. Brian alluded to it. There is increasing competition. You see people getting ahead of it a little bit. customers are feeling the fact that the Fed will move, therefore their expectations are for a bump in rates. We continue to assess that. We've done some things strategically, specifically on a CD side where we were a little bit more aggressive, for lack of a better term, on a 25-month CD because we don't want to continually have to deal with the churn and the pricing exceptions that would come through. So we've been out in front of that. We've done, you know, as part of the quarter that Brian referenced on the expense side, we spent some money on the marketing side on a checking account campaign. So we've been pushing across the board in terms of what we're trying to do. But the market is competitive out there. People are stepping up from a competitive perspective on rates across the, you know, whether it's CDs, whether it's money market accounts, etc. The offers that you see in our marketplace for checking accounts are can be as high as $800 to open up a checking account. Now you have to read the fine print and see everything that goes along with that. But it is an aggressive and competitive marketplace. We think we're doing pretty good at this point in time, but there will be some pressure as we move forward and into 2027.

Okay, that makes sense. And then the last one for me, could you give me an update on your guys' expansion in some of your new markets like Western PA and Maryland? and your willingness to continue hiring in those markets.

Yeah, so I would say, Tim, consistent with, I think we've talked about this a couple times over the last year or so, what we originally anticipated doing in both of those marketplaces was slowed down by the pandemic and then the Thank you for joining us. You can't wait on those because they won't be there if you quote unquote wait till you're ready. So to the extent that we see lift out opportunities in either marketplace, we will jump on that as long as we can get good sales talent and add that to the team.

Got it. Thanks for the color. Thanks, Chip.

Your next question comes from the line of Matthew Breezy from Stevens Inc. Your line is live.

Hey, good morning. Hey, good morning. Maybe we could just start with the loan that was charged off and just be curious, you know, what happened there? What asset class was it? You know, is it indicative of anything else going on within that kind of bucket? And then Jeff, you know, at the start, you'd kind of mentioned that quality is stable to improving. Just curious if we should read that as, you know, what you're seeing behind the scenes indicates that MPAs can continue to be kind of down to the right in future periods.

Yeah, so I'll start, Matt, with regards to the loan. CNI Credit, in more of a cyclical industry, you know, look, it was a significantly, I'll even say like $70 to $80 million revenue company with strong EBITDA when we entered into it. and, you know, it just, you know, as you go through it without, because I can't get into all the details for obvious reasons, but if you look at it, basically management did not execute at the level that they needed to and while additional equity was put into the company, it just deteriorated at a faster pace than what was necessary to suffice and support the debt that was associated with the company. You know, it was, you know, combination of term debt and lines of credit. The term debt had a more aggressive pay down that should have helped us and was helping us as we move forward here. And the line of credit was a working capital line of credit that was supported by inventory and receivables. At the end of the day, it's not indicative of anything that I would say in the marketplace nor in our portfolio. It was a single credit that just was not executing at the level that it needed to do to support the debt level that was on the company.

Yeah, and overall, you know, we are seeing stable and improving credit quality, not that we saw deteriorating credit quality other than this one off with this one credit. You know, for the fourth quarter, we're conservatively looking at criticized classifieds going down in the $35 to $40 million range with, you know, potential upside there. as we work through some other credits. So we're seeing really good asset quality, to be honest with you, and we would expect that our metrics will continue to improve as we head into year end and honestly into beginning of next year.

Okay, I appreciate that.

You know, you had mentioned kind of strong pipelines, and obviously there's some moving parts with the credit this quarter, but overall loan balances were down. So I'm curious, how is the pipeline heading into this quarter? How does the pipeline today stack up relative to that? And the question in between there is, what are you seeing on the prepay and payoff front? Can we get some decent growth in the coming quarters?

Yeah, so the pipelines are strong, Matt, as referenced in the remarks. The The payoff of the SNCC that occurred, that was planned, and we actually worked with the borrower and actually communicated well with that. And the reality is we think there's other opportunities with that same borrower on different parts of their businesses. So it was anticipated, planned, and we actually think there's opportunities there to go from there. You got to also remember, and we allude to it, but we are back to the mortgage business being completely oriented based on Fannie, Freddie, FHA, so originate and sell. So our mortgage portfolio is actually declining quarter over quarter consistently. Now, as rates are up, that might slow down a little bit because we don't get paid off as quickly as we otherwise would have. But the mortgage business, which used to be a net add to loan growth, is now a net subtractor consistently on a quarter over quarter basis. And on the CRE side, we really changed our focus to be more of a commercial construction lender. So you see commitments are growing and that will drive growth at a nominal level as we move forward here. But we are not primarily doing any long term CRE holds at this point in time. So that CRE business is also basically churning the same level of capital in growth. So there's factors of we got a planned payoff of the SNIC, obviously the charge loss that we took, and then there's some methodology changes and philosophy changes that we've adjusted to on the residential mortgage side as well as the CRE side, which is naturally bringing our loan growth down. and really the intent behind all of it was so that we can get, we believe we can get higher fees on the construction side of the business and higher rates, which helps us from a profitability perspective, but also this philosophy allows us to get our long-term loan to deposit ratio in line with the 95 to 100% consistently where we want to live.

Okay.

All right. So it does sound like, you know, the loan book died for this year, two to 3%, probably, Good to carry out near term. And along with your kind of loan to deposit ratio point there, you know, how much of deposit growth this quarter was seasonal? And we should anticipate coming out. And I'm curious where the loan to deposit ratio kind of settles out, you know, X kind of seasonality.

Yeah, so a good portion. I mean, we saw a couple hundred million dollars of our total increase, $420 million coming in. during the quarter. A significant portion of that was in fact public funds. We do expect that to run out $100 million each quarter until we wind down to June of next year. So we'd see that start to kind of pull back a little bit. Of course, the offset is in periods like this, We do other higher-cost deposits that we have out there, as well as brokers. We dial those back into time like this as well, so that'll be a give and a take in our overall loan-to-deposit ratio. That said, we do look to continue not doing anything drastic in one given quarter, but looking to manage that down methodically into that 95% to 100% range sustainable. and really I think it's important to look year over year just based on the seasonality and where we're trending and that's really what we focus on is how we're doing this year versus last as we march that down.

Okay. I really appreciate it. That's all I had. Thank you.

Thanks, Matt.

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Manuel Navas from Piper Sandler. Your line is live.

Hey, good morning. I understand the puts and takes on the loan portfolio. Is there a point where you could see it accelerate when you have it kind of a mix that you're looking for and kind of thoughts into next year on growth? Is it the 2% to 3% seem to hold into next year?

I'll just talk in philosophy and then Brian can obviously add in.

Look, I think you really need to look at it as where we can go beyond just seasonal pickups and deposits from public funds. When we consistently grow deposits, and we can, at attractive levels, and we can do it consistently. Like I said, we will continue to increase and I think we can grow loans at a faster pace. That said, the drag, for lack of a better term, of the change in methodology on the residential mortgage side and the commercial real estate side is not insignificant. So will we grow loans at a faster pace over time? I believe we will. Will it be based on what we used to do historically? No, it will not.

and I would expect from a guide perspective, while we're not giving formal guidance for next year, I would expect that trend that we saw this year really continue in light of what Mike said with our kind of deposit consideration and where we expect to grow there.

Beyond your own appetite on the CRE side, are you seeing higher rates impact any of your projects that you're considering or seeing in your borrower base?

Look, we do a really good job. Our credit team, together with the line, looks at all of the deals that we have outstanding and have been doing shocks and getting in discussions with customers to see where they were. So we've been, and this gets back to overall credit quality and why we believe that absent these couple blips, we're in a strong position. The reality is that we've been working with people. Yeah, look, there's no doubt that increases in interest rates are going to put some additional stress on projects. But we believe, based on what we've looked at, that we're in a good shape. And to the extent that we need a borrower to put additional capital into the equation here, we do that. And we're successful in that because we're having those discussions 12 months in advance of when the loans are going to reset or come to maturity. On top of that, the counter to this a little bit is, have we seen kind of new deals people take a step back? Yes. In terms of we didn't close the loan, people have decided based upon where rates may be heading that they're going to pause on that opportunity until they get a better picture of the rate forecast longer term. We think we're in good position where we are with the existing book, but we are starting to see a slowdown from the perspective of people hesitating before they actually launch a new project based upon where the right environment is.

Got it. Last question for me. Can you run through an update on capital deployment opportunities? Where is the pace of the buyback fit in and kind of any added color on thoughts on M&A, Dividend, and where the pace of buyback fits in with those deployment opportunities.

Yeah, sure. So, you know, with respect to buybacks, we would expect to continue to be active in that market, similar to how we have been for, you know, a couple years now at this point that we don't see that slowing down. Additionally, we are open to M&A. You know, we want it to be strategic. Obviously, we're focused on payback periods and the like. But it is something that while we took a pause for a couple of years, it's something that we're very open to now in the right markets. And if the right opportunity were to come along, it's definitely something that we would entertain. So capital deployment, it's all across the board. The board of directors is always looking at what our dividend is, what our payout ratio is. When we contemplate that, we're definitely going to be active in buybacks, but we also like to have dry powder in case any type of opportunities arose, whether it's on the bank side, the wealth management side, or the insurance side. So it's something that we definitely are open to and looking to continue to try to execute on all fronts.

Thank you. I appreciate the commentary this morning.

Thank you.

This concludes our question and answer session. I'd like to now turn the call back over to Jeff Schweitzer for closing remarks.

Thank you, Jordan. I'd just like to thank everybody for listening in today and for the questions. We really appreciate the participation and we look forward to ending 2026 on a high note and This concludes today's meeting. You may now disconnect.